Evaluation tools through user participation techniques: Features, limitations, and new perspectives

Selem Charfi, H. Ezzedine
{"title":"Evaluation tools through user participation techniques: Features, limitations, and new perspectives","authors":"Selem Charfi, H. Ezzedine","doi":"10.1109/ICAdLT.2014.6864074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of user interfaces is a rich theme in terms of concepts, approaches, and tools. The related tools are numerous that they are mainly classified into two categories. The first one includes the tools based on expert analysis techniques. These tools require a designer and/or an evaluator during the evaluation process. The second category issued tools require user participation in the evaluation process. In this article, we focus on the second category related tools. These tools are so numerous that we estimate that it is interesting to study them. They are based on user action data capture, study, and analysis in order to evaluate user interfaces. This paper aims at drawing up the features, the limitations, and the perspectives of existing user interface evaluation tools based on user participation techniques.","PeriodicalId":166090,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAdLT.2014.6864074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The evaluation of user interfaces is a rich theme in terms of concepts, approaches, and tools. The related tools are numerous that they are mainly classified into two categories. The first one includes the tools based on expert analysis techniques. These tools require a designer and/or an evaluator during the evaluation process. The second category issued tools require user participation in the evaluation process. In this article, we focus on the second category related tools. These tools are so numerous that we estimate that it is interesting to study them. They are based on user action data capture, study, and analysis in order to evaluate user interfaces. This paper aims at drawing up the features, the limitations, and the perspectives of existing user interface evaluation tools based on user participation techniques.
通过用户参与技术评估工具:特性、限制和新视角
就概念、方法和工具而言,用户界面的评估是一个丰富的主题。相关的工具很多,它们主要分为两类。第一类包括基于专家分析技术的工具。这些工具在评估过程中需要设计者和/或评估者。第二类发布的工具要求用户参与评估过程。在本文中,我们主要关注第二类相关工具。这些工具如此之多,我们估计研究它们是很有趣的。它们基于用户行为数据的捕获、研究和分析,以评估用户界面。本文旨在总结现有的基于用户参与技术的用户界面评估工具的特点、局限性和前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信