USDA Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Is More Effective in Town and Rural Schools Than Those in More Populated Communities.

Yi-Chun Lin, A. Fly
{"title":"USDA Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Is More Effective in Town and Rural Schools Than Those in More Populated Communities.","authors":"Yi-Chun Lin, A. Fly","doi":"10.1111/josh.12432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nWe attempted to determine effects of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) on variety and frequency of fruit and vegetable intake by students in schools from different locales.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData were derived from the 2011-2012 Indiana FFVP Student Survey completed by 4229 fourth-sixth graders. Effects were studied within 2 groups, 39 city and suburb schools, and 12 town and rural schools. Differences in students' responses over time to 2 items measuring variety and 10 items measuring fruit and vegetable intake frequency were determined with multilevel regression models.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTown and rural students were 1.2 times more likely to eat different kinds of fruit (p = .04) and vegetables (p = .01) daily, and increased fruit (+1.0 time/day; p < .01) and vegetable intake frequency (+0.5 times/day; p = .03). City and suburb students increased fruit intake frequency (∼0.8 times/day; p < .01) but not vegetable intake frequency or daily variety (p > .05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nFFVP improved fruit and vegetable eating behaviors in the \"town and rural\" group, but was only partially effective in the \"city and suburb\" group. Strategies to implement FFVP may need to differ depending on school locale.","PeriodicalId":225843,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of school health","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of school health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND We attempted to determine effects of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) on variety and frequency of fruit and vegetable intake by students in schools from different locales. METHODS Data were derived from the 2011-2012 Indiana FFVP Student Survey completed by 4229 fourth-sixth graders. Effects were studied within 2 groups, 39 city and suburb schools, and 12 town and rural schools. Differences in students' responses over time to 2 items measuring variety and 10 items measuring fruit and vegetable intake frequency were determined with multilevel regression models. RESULTS Town and rural students were 1.2 times more likely to eat different kinds of fruit (p = .04) and vegetables (p = .01) daily, and increased fruit (+1.0 time/day; p < .01) and vegetable intake frequency (+0.5 times/day; p = .03). City and suburb students increased fruit intake frequency (∼0.8 times/day; p < .01) but not vegetable intake frequency or daily variety (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS FFVP improved fruit and vegetable eating behaviors in the "town and rural" group, but was only partially effective in the "city and suburb" group. Strategies to implement FFVP may need to differ depending on school locale.
美国农业部新鲜水果和蔬菜项目在城镇和农村学校比在人口稠密的社区更有效。
背景:我们试图确定美国农业部(USDA)新鲜水果和蔬菜计划(FFVP)对不同地区学校学生水果和蔬菜摄入量的种类和频率的影响。方法数据来源于2011-2012年印第安纳州FFVP学生调查,由4229名四年级六年级学生完成。研究对象为2组,分别为39所城市及郊区学校和12所城镇及农村学校。采用多水平回归模型考察学生对2个测量品种和10个测量果蔬摄入频率题目的反应随时间的差异。结果城镇学生和农村学生每天食用不同种类水果(p = 0.04)和蔬菜(p = 0.01)的比例分别高出1.2倍和1.2倍,增加了水果(+1.0次/天);P < 0.01)和蔬菜摄入频率(+0.5次/d);P = .03)。城市和郊区学生的水果摄入频率增加(~ 0.8次/天);P < 0.01),但与蔬菜摄入频率和日品种无关(P > 0.05)。结论sffvp改善了“城乡”群体的水果和蔬菜饮食行为,但对“城市和郊区”群体仅部分有效。实施FFVP的策略可能因学校环境而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信