Analysing students’ perceptions of two learning and evaluation modalities in the InGenio FCE Online Course and Tester

A. M. Sáez, Ana Sevilla-Pavón, A. G. Sanz
{"title":"Analysing students’ perceptions of two learning and evaluation modalities in the InGenio FCE Online Course and Tester","authors":"A. M. Sáez, Ana Sevilla-Pavón, A. G. Sanz","doi":"10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instructors have to make important decisions regarding the type of assessment that will finally be implemented when producing online learning materials, since this has a noticeable effect in terms of the methodology, the approach, and the attitude of all the actors involved (Goertler, 2011). This study investigates students? perception of tutor assessment and self-assessment in an online upper-intermediate level English course (described in Martinez-Saez, 2015) and testing tool (described in Sevilla Pavon, 2013). After the implementation of these learning resources through the online authoring tool and content manager InGenio4, 95 students participated in the study conducted for the validation stages. The statistical analysis of the data gathered by means of questionnaires showed that the students highly appreciated the freedom to learn at their own pace offered by these two modalities which can contribute to autonomous progress and learning.","PeriodicalId":138095,"journal":{"name":"Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Instructors have to make important decisions regarding the type of assessment that will finally be implemented when producing online learning materials, since this has a noticeable effect in terms of the methodology, the approach, and the attitude of all the actors involved (Goertler, 2011). This study investigates students? perception of tutor assessment and self-assessment in an online upper-intermediate level English course (described in Martinez-Saez, 2015) and testing tool (described in Sevilla Pavon, 2013). After the implementation of these learning resources through the online authoring tool and content manager InGenio4, 95 students participated in the study conducted for the validation stages. The statistical analysis of the data gathered by means of questionnaires showed that the students highly appreciated the freedom to learn at their own pace offered by these two modalities which can contribute to autonomous progress and learning.
分析学生对InGenio FCE在线课程和测试中两种学习和评估模式的看法
在制作在线学习材料时,教师必须就最终实施的评估类型做出重要决定,因为这对所有参与者的方法论、方法和态度都有显著影响(Goertler, 2011)。这项研究调查了学生?对在线中高水平英语课程(Martinez-Saez, 2015)和测试工具(Sevilla Pavon, 2013)中导师评估和自我评估的感知。这些学习资源通过在线创作工具和内容管理器InGenio4实施后,95名学生参与了验证阶段的研究。通过问卷调查收集的数据进行统计分析,学生们非常欣赏这两种模式所提供的自由学习的节奏,这有助于自主进步和学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信