{"title":"Investigating the physical determinants of social capital and their implications for sustainable urban development","authors":"C. Moobela, A. Price, V. Mathur, P. Paranagamage","doi":"10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/V05I02/54596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of social capital is gaining increasing recognition as a concomitant for social and economic development. Robert Putnam’s (2000) exposition of the crucial correspondence between the decline of social capital on one hand and the economic lives of American people on the other received wide acclaim at home and abroad. Contemporary literature on development studies is equally replete with references to the World Bank’s subscription to the value of social capital as an important factor in fostering sustainable development. The relationship between social capital and environmental action has equally been acknowledged. There is also an increasing realisation that the design and form of cities, neighbourhoods and individual buildings have significant implications on social capital as they can affect the way people interact and bond with each other and the sense of community among individuals (Dannenberg et al, 2003; Lindstrom et al, 2003). The fundamental premise is that some urban designs encourage social ties and informal contact among residents while others violate the evolutionary pattern of civicness within the urban setting. With all these acclaimed contributions of the design of the urban environment, it is imperative that its role in encouraging social and fostering sustainable development is given greater articulation and understanding. Currently, much of the work focuses on what individuals and groups can do, rather than what the physical environment should be, in order to encourage social ties and civicness. Thus, the aim of this paper is to identify and examine the key physical determinants of social capital within an urban development context. The methods used include critical analysis of scholarly work supplemented by results of a survey carried out by the authors in the United Kingdom. The paper argues that social capital is a subject of self-organisation, whose evolution to higher levels can be catalysed by the prevalence of a critical balance in the design of the physical urban environment.","PeriodicalId":417541,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability: Annual Review","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability: Annual Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/V05I02/54596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
The concept of social capital is gaining increasing recognition as a concomitant for social and economic development. Robert Putnam’s (2000) exposition of the crucial correspondence between the decline of social capital on one hand and the economic lives of American people on the other received wide acclaim at home and abroad. Contemporary literature on development studies is equally replete with references to the World Bank’s subscription to the value of social capital as an important factor in fostering sustainable development. The relationship between social capital and environmental action has equally been acknowledged. There is also an increasing realisation that the design and form of cities, neighbourhoods and individual buildings have significant implications on social capital as they can affect the way people interact and bond with each other and the sense of community among individuals (Dannenberg et al, 2003; Lindstrom et al, 2003). The fundamental premise is that some urban designs encourage social ties and informal contact among residents while others violate the evolutionary pattern of civicness within the urban setting. With all these acclaimed contributions of the design of the urban environment, it is imperative that its role in encouraging social and fostering sustainable development is given greater articulation and understanding. Currently, much of the work focuses on what individuals and groups can do, rather than what the physical environment should be, in order to encourage social ties and civicness. Thus, the aim of this paper is to identify and examine the key physical determinants of social capital within an urban development context. The methods used include critical analysis of scholarly work supplemented by results of a survey carried out by the authors in the United Kingdom. The paper argues that social capital is a subject of self-organisation, whose evolution to higher levels can be catalysed by the prevalence of a critical balance in the design of the physical urban environment.
作为社会经济发展的伴生物,社会资本的概念正得到越来越多的认可。罗伯特·普特南(2000)阐述了社会资本的衰落与美国人民的经济生活之间的关键对应关系,在国内外广受好评。关于发展研究的当代文献同样充满了世界银行对社会资本价值的认同,认为这是促进可持续发展的一个重要因素。社会资本与环境行动之间的关系也同样得到了承认。人们也越来越认识到,城市、社区和个体建筑的设计和形式对社会资本有重大影响,因为它们可以影响人们互动和相互联系的方式,以及个人之间的社区意识(Dannenberg等人,2003;Lindstrom et al, 2003)。基本前提是,一些城市设计鼓励居民之间的社会联系和非正式接触,而另一些则违反了城市环境中公民的进化模式。鉴于城市环境设计的所有这些广受赞誉的贡献,它在鼓励社会和促进可持续发展方面的作用必须得到更大的阐明和理解。目前,为了鼓励社会联系和文明,大部分工作都集中在个人和群体可以做什么,而不是物理环境应该是什么。因此,本文的目的是在城市发展背景下确定和研究社会资本的关键物理决定因素。所使用的方法包括对学术工作的批判性分析,并辅以作者在英国进行的调查结果。本文认为,社会资本是一个自我组织的主体,其向更高水平的进化可以通过城市物理环境设计中普遍存在的关键平衡来催化。