Quality Measurement Model for Analysis and Design Tools Based on FLOSS

O. Alfonzo, Kenyer Domínguez, Lornel Rivas, M. Pérez, L. Mendoza, Maryoly Ortega
{"title":"Quality Measurement Model for Analysis and Design Tools Based on FLOSS","authors":"O. Alfonzo, Kenyer Domínguez, Lornel Rivas, M. Pérez, L. Mendoza, Maryoly Ortega","doi":"10.1109/ASWEC.2008.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) tools for Analysis and Design (A&D) is a hard task due to their complexity, their wide variety within the market, and their functionality level. This article aims at introducing a group of quality features to evaluate FLOSS tools for A&D. Such features are presented based on the perspective of the Software Quality Systemic Model (MOSCA), inspired by ISO/IEC 9126 [9], Dromey's quality model [5] and the Goal-Question-Metrics (GQM) Paradigm. This model includes attributes such as functionality, usability and maintainability, and establishes 52 new metrics for a total of 102 metrics that allow evaluating FLOSS tools for A&D within a specific context. Lastly, validation of this proposal is verified through its application on eight FLOSS-based A&D tools.","PeriodicalId":231903,"journal":{"name":"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2008.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The selection of Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) tools for Analysis and Design (A&D) is a hard task due to their complexity, their wide variety within the market, and their functionality level. This article aims at introducing a group of quality features to evaluate FLOSS tools for A&D. Such features are presented based on the perspective of the Software Quality Systemic Model (MOSCA), inspired by ISO/IEC 9126 [9], Dromey's quality model [5] and the Goal-Question-Metrics (GQM) Paradigm. This model includes attributes such as functionality, usability and maintainability, and establishes 52 new metrics for a total of 102 metrics that allow evaluating FLOSS tools for A&D within a specific context. Lastly, validation of this proposal is verified through its application on eight FLOSS-based A&D tools.
基于FLOSS的分析设计工具质量度量模型
为分析和设计(A&D)选择免费/自由开源软件(FLOSS)工具是一项艰巨的任务,因为它们的复杂性、市场上的多样性以及它们的功能水平。本文旨在介绍一组质量特性来评估用于A&D的FLOSS工具。这些特征是基于软件质量系统模型(MOSCA)的视角提出的,受到ISO/IEC 9126[9]、Dromey的质量模型[5]和目标-问题-度量(GQM)范式的启发。该模型包括功能、可用性和可维护性等属性,并建立了52个新指标,总共102个指标允许在特定的上下文中评估用于A&D的FLOSS工具。最后,通过在8个基于floss的测控工具上的应用验证了该方案的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信