PERANAN KPPU DALAM PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT AKIBAT PERSEKONGKOLAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 14/KPPU-L/2019)

Lesson Sihotang
{"title":"PERANAN KPPU DALAM PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT AKIBAT PERSEKONGKOLAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 14/KPPU-L/2019)","authors":"Lesson Sihotang","doi":"10.51622/vsh.v2i2.473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within 1 (one) year, the increase in cases of tender conspiracy has increased. This shows that many business actors from these actions taken to practice are still in business, which results in unfair competition in doing business. The purpose of this research is to find out how KPPU proves the existence of a tender conspiracy related to Decision No. 14/KPPU-L/2019 and to find out the application of the law according to Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition by the judge in decision no. 14/KPPU-L/2019. Conducting this research using library research methods and data analysis used in a qualitative descriptive way is an approach to gain depth, develop theory and social complexity. The writer concludes that in carrying out the proof, KPPU uses the rule of reason and the per se illegal approach. The application of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition by judges related to decision no. 2019 uses an animation stream and a progressive stream which produce an explanation of the relevant laws and regulations, about vertical conspiracy, and about fulfilling the elements of article 22 of Law No. 5 of 1999.","PeriodicalId":124573,"journal":{"name":"Visi Sosial Humaniora","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visi Sosial Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51622/vsh.v2i2.473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within 1 (one) year, the increase in cases of tender conspiracy has increased. This shows that many business actors from these actions taken to practice are still in business, which results in unfair competition in doing business. The purpose of this research is to find out how KPPU proves the existence of a tender conspiracy related to Decision No. 14/KPPU-L/2019 and to find out the application of the law according to Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition by the judge in decision no. 14/KPPU-L/2019. Conducting this research using library research methods and data analysis used in a qualitative descriptive way is an approach to gain depth, develop theory and social complexity. The writer concludes that in carrying out the proof, KPPU uses the rule of reason and the per se illegal approach. The application of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition by judges related to decision no. 2019 uses an animation stream and a progressive stream which produce an explanation of the relevant laws and regulations, about vertical conspiracy, and about fulfilling the elements of article 22 of Law No. 5 of 1999.
KPPU在垄断和商业竞争中所起的作用是由阴谋所产生的。2019 KPPU-L / 14)
在一年内,投标串谋案件的增加有所增加。这表明,从这些行动中采取的许多商业行为者仍然在经营,这导致了在经营中不公平的竞争。本研究的目的是找出KPPU如何证明与第14/KPPU- l /2019号决定相关的投标串谋的存在,并找出法官在第14/KPPU- l /2019号决定中根据1999年第5号法关于禁止垄断行为和不正当商业竞争的法律适用情况。14 / KPPU-L / 2019。利用图书馆研究方法和定性描述方式使用的数据分析进行这项研究是一种获得深度,发展理论和社会复杂性的方法。在举证过程中,法院采用了理性原则和本身违法的方法。法官对1999年第5号关于禁止垄断行为和不正当商业竞争的法律的适用情况与第2号决定有关。2019使用动画流和渐进流来解释相关法律法规,关于垂直阴谋,以及关于履行1999年第5号法律第22条的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信