Analyzing the Politics of Legislative Debate

M. Laver
{"title":"Analyzing the Politics of Legislative Debate","authors":"M. Laver","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198849063.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers why we should be interested in the politics of legislative debate. What does the analysis of legislative debate contribute to our understanding of politics more generally? This is particularly important given that legislative debate is not actually “debate” in any meaningful sense of the word, and that most legislators are not even present when most legislative speeches are made. The answers offered here rest on the assumption that speeches in the legislature allow legislators to commit to policy positions on the official record. If the main concern is politics between parties, debate speeches tend to concern actual policy implementation, likely closer to “true” preferences than electoral aspirations and promises. If the prime concern is politics within parties, debate speeches can give insight into internal party policy divisions, even in settings where the final legislative party vote is tightly whipped.","PeriodicalId":217414,"journal":{"name":"The Politics of Legislative Debates","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics of Legislative Debates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849063.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter considers why we should be interested in the politics of legislative debate. What does the analysis of legislative debate contribute to our understanding of politics more generally? This is particularly important given that legislative debate is not actually “debate” in any meaningful sense of the word, and that most legislators are not even present when most legislative speeches are made. The answers offered here rest on the assumption that speeches in the legislature allow legislators to commit to policy positions on the official record. If the main concern is politics between parties, debate speeches tend to concern actual policy implementation, likely closer to “true” preferences than electoral aspirations and promises. If the prime concern is politics within parties, debate speeches can give insight into internal party policy divisions, even in settings where the final legislative party vote is tightly whipped.
立法辩论的政治分析
这一章考虑了为什么我们应该对立法辩论的政治感兴趣。对立法辩论的分析对我们更普遍地理解政治有什么贡献?这一点尤其重要,因为立法辩论实际上并不是“辩论”这个词的任何有意义的意义,而且大多数立法者甚至在大多数立法演讲时都不在场。这里给出的答案是基于这样一个假设,即立法机构的演讲允许立法者在官方记录中承诺政策立场。如果主要关注的是政党之间的政治,辩论演讲往往关注实际的政策实施,可能更接近于“真实”的偏好,而不是选举的愿望和承诺。如果主要关注的是政党内部的政治,辩论演讲可以让人洞察政党内部的政策分歧,即使是在立法机构最终投票受到严格控制的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信