Procedural Peculiarities of the Jurisdiction of Defamation Disputes Reviewed by General Jurisdiction Courts

Elena M. Kobzarenko
{"title":"Procedural Peculiarities of the Jurisdiction of Defamation Disputes Reviewed by General Jurisdiction Courts","authors":"Elena M. Kobzarenko","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-39-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the procedural features of determining the jurisdiction of disputes on the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation, considered by the courts of general jurisdiction, taking into account the elements of the claim, its characteristic features, provides specific examples of judicial practice on the issue of determining the competent court, generic (substantive), territorial jurisdiction of a dispute on protection against defamation, substantiates the need to change the rules of jurisdiction of claims against the media and owners of sites on the Internet. The author formulated specific proposals aimed at changing the rules on the jurisdiction of defamation disputes, referring such claims to an alternative jurisdiction at the choice of the plaintiff.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"32 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-39-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the procedural features of determining the jurisdiction of disputes on the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation, considered by the courts of general jurisdiction, taking into account the elements of the claim, its characteristic features, provides specific examples of judicial practice on the issue of determining the competent court, generic (substantive), territorial jurisdiction of a dispute on protection against defamation, substantiates the need to change the rules of jurisdiction of claims against the media and owners of sites on the Internet. The author formulated specific proposals aimed at changing the rules on the jurisdiction of defamation disputes, referring such claims to an alternative jurisdiction at the choice of the plaintiff.
普通管辖权法院对诽谤纠纷管辖权的程序特点研究
本文考察了一般管辖权法院考虑的关于保护荣誉、尊严和商业声誉的争议管辖权的程序特征,考虑到索赔的要素,其特征,提供了关于确定关于防止诽谤的争议的主管法院、一般(实质性)、领土管辖权问题的司法实践的具体例子。证明有必要改变针对互联网媒体和网站所有者索赔的管辖权规则。作者提出了具体建议,旨在改变诽谤纠纷的管辖权规则,根据原告的选择,将这类索赔提交另一个司法管辖区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信