E-learning Portal Success in higher education organizations: A multi-group comparison

S. Roy
{"title":"E-learning Portal Success in higher education organizations: A multi-group comparison","authors":"S. Roy","doi":"10.35912/jshe.v3i3.1294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study provides an analytical framework based on the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of E-learning portals. The study aims to contrast the accessibility of e-learning portals from the perspectives of business and engineering students. Research methodology: Using convenience and snowball sampling methods with the help of Google polls, the data was acquired from 482 students, including engineering and business students. The study used a seven-point Likert-type questionnaire to gather data. The study employed PLS-SEM to do a multi-group analysis and examine group differences. Results: The results revealed user satisfaction predicts the system used for both models. Only e-service quality is the significant predictor of user satisfaction and the system used in the business model, but the system and information qualities are also predictors in the engineering model. Finally, the success of an e-learning portal is positively correlated with user satisfaction and system use. Limitations: This study consists of only a sample of 482 students. Future research may take into account using a bigger sample size. Additionally, this study mostly focused on how students perceived the efficacy of the e-learning portal while ignoring the viewpoints of the instructors and the institution, which may vary. Contribution: Higher administration in Bangladeshi educational institutions will find the study helpful in building policies and plans for the growth of e-learning portals. Novelty: This work validates the DeLone and McLean Model in the context of Bangladeshi undergraduate students. The study shows how business and engineering students' access to e-learning portals varies.","PeriodicalId":198092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v3i3.1294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: This study provides an analytical framework based on the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of E-learning portals. The study aims to contrast the accessibility of e-learning portals from the perspectives of business and engineering students. Research methodology: Using convenience and snowball sampling methods with the help of Google polls, the data was acquired from 482 students, including engineering and business students. The study used a seven-point Likert-type questionnaire to gather data. The study employed PLS-SEM to do a multi-group analysis and examine group differences. Results: The results revealed user satisfaction predicts the system used for both models. Only e-service quality is the significant predictor of user satisfaction and the system used in the business model, but the system and information qualities are also predictors in the engineering model. Finally, the success of an e-learning portal is positively correlated with user satisfaction and system use. Limitations: This study consists of only a sample of 482 students. Future research may take into account using a bigger sample size. Additionally, this study mostly focused on how students perceived the efficacy of the e-learning portal while ignoring the viewpoints of the instructors and the institution, which may vary. Contribution: Higher administration in Bangladeshi educational institutions will find the study helpful in building policies and plans for the growth of e-learning portals. Novelty: This work validates the DeLone and McLean Model in the context of Bangladeshi undergraduate students. The study shows how business and engineering students' access to e-learning portals varies.
高等教育组织的电子学习门户成功:多组比较
目的:本研究在文献的基础上提供一个分析框架来评估电子学习门户网站的有效性。本研究旨在从商科和工科学生的角度对比电子学习门户网站的可访问性。研究方法:采用便利抽样和滚雪球抽样的方法,借助谷歌的民意调查,从482名学生中获得数据,包括工程和商业学生。这项研究使用李克特式的七点问卷来收集数据。本研究采用PLS-SEM进行多组分析,观察组间差异。结果:结果显示用户满意度预测系统用于两个模型。在商业模型中,只有电子服务质量是用户满意度和系统使用的重要预测因子,但在工程模型中,系统和信息质量也是预测因子。最后,电子学习门户网站的成功与用户满意度和系统使用呈正相关。局限性:本研究仅包括482名学生的样本。未来的研究可能会考虑使用更大的样本量。此外,本研究主要关注学生如何感知电子学习门户的有效性,而忽略了教师和机构的观点,这些观点可能会有所不同。贡献:孟加拉国教育机构的高级管理部门将发现这项研究有助于制定电子学习门户网站发展的政策和计划。新颖性:本研究在孟加拉国本科生的背景下验证了DeLone和McLean模型。该研究显示,商科和工科学生访问电子学习门户网站的方式各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信