Prelude to genocide: “the Armenian question” and the massacres in the Ottoman Empire

R. Tanasă
{"title":"Prelude to genocide: “the Armenian question” and the massacres in the Ottoman Empire","authors":"R. Tanasă","doi":"10.26424/rjmh.2022.13.1-2:49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The faith of the Ottoman Armenians was closely linked to the decline of the Ottoman Empire in the last decades of the 19th century and the first two decades of the 20th century. The interests of the European diplomacy, the bundle of religious and ethnic communities competing for status and resources, the administrative inefficiency and corruption of state officials and a mischievous rule of Abdul Hamid II created the powder keg that led to a political deterioration for all parties involved in the Ottoman “millet system”. The status-quo of centuries of Muslim ascendancy was succumbing and the sultan’s authority was menaced by the lack of unity between the different state constituents. The Ottoman elite started looking for someone to blame for the fall back and since the Armenians were eager to improve their condition, even working together with the external enemies of the Porte, they gradually became the excellent scapegoat. The political fragility of the Ottoman state made the massacres against the Armenians possible, opening the path for a prospect to better homogenize and strengthen the state: the physical exclusion of Armenians through annihilation or ottomanization/turkification.","PeriodicalId":235601,"journal":{"name":"The Romanian Journal of Modern History","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Romanian Journal of Modern History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26424/rjmh.2022.13.1-2:49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The faith of the Ottoman Armenians was closely linked to the decline of the Ottoman Empire in the last decades of the 19th century and the first two decades of the 20th century. The interests of the European diplomacy, the bundle of religious and ethnic communities competing for status and resources, the administrative inefficiency and corruption of state officials and a mischievous rule of Abdul Hamid II created the powder keg that led to a political deterioration for all parties involved in the Ottoman “millet system”. The status-quo of centuries of Muslim ascendancy was succumbing and the sultan’s authority was menaced by the lack of unity between the different state constituents. The Ottoman elite started looking for someone to blame for the fall back and since the Armenians were eager to improve their condition, even working together with the external enemies of the Porte, they gradually became the excellent scapegoat. The political fragility of the Ottoman state made the massacres against the Armenians possible, opening the path for a prospect to better homogenize and strengthen the state: the physical exclusion of Armenians through annihilation or ottomanization/turkification.
种族灭绝的前奏:“亚美尼亚问题”和奥斯曼帝国的大屠杀
奥斯曼亚美尼亚人的信仰与奥斯曼帝国在19世纪最后几十年和20世纪头20年的衰落密切相关。欧洲外交的利益,宗教和民族团体争夺地位和资源,行政效率低下和国家官员的腐败以及阿卜杜勒哈米德二世的恶作剧统治创造了一个火药桶,导致了奥斯曼“小米制度”中所有各方的政治恶化。几个世纪以来穆斯林统治的现状正在消失,苏丹的权威受到不同国家成员之间缺乏团结的威胁。奥斯曼帝国的精英们开始寻找替罪羊,因为亚美尼亚人渴望改善他们的状况,甚至与Porte的外部敌人合作,他们逐渐成为了绝佳的替罪羊。奥斯曼国家的政治脆弱性使得对亚美尼亚人的屠杀成为可能,为更好地同质化和加强国家的前景开辟了道路:通过消灭或奥斯曼化/突厥化对亚美尼亚人进行物理排斥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信