Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat secara Bersama-Sama (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor 305/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt.Timur)

Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Pub Date : 2022-03-02 DOI:10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4640.66-71

I Gede Eka Suantara, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

{"title":"Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat secara Bersama-Sama (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor 305/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt.Timur)","authors":"I Gede Eka Suantara, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, Ni Made Sukaryati Karma","doi":"10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4640.66-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia is a legal state in which all aspects are regulated by applicable law to determine the obligations, rights and obligations in monitoring one's own and social desires. Of course, the existence of applicable laws in Indonesia has a very good influence in order because it can control all kinds of criminal activities that occur in society. This study aims to reveal the form of criminal sanctions and legal considerations given by the panel of judges in imposing a sentence on the perpetrators of the crime of forging letters which were carried out together. This research uses normative legal writing method. Sources of data used are primary and secondary data. Data analysis is used in a qualitative, in-depth and comprehensive way and when analyzing legal materials, namely by argumentation through explaining legal incident materials or legal results in detail to facilitate interpretation in the analysis. The results in the study indicate that in terms of considering the judge's role when giving criminal sanctions to the defendant on behalf of Ahmad Saifudin in the decision Number 305/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt.Tim, in which the defendant was sentenced for what he had done, he was sentenced to 1 year 2 months jail. The conclusion of the study is that joint criminal sanctions in carrying out the criminal act of forging letters together can be imposed as described in Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code regarding the crime of forging letters, threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of six years. The researcher hopes that in deciding a case the judge can consider everything","PeriodicalId":197649,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4640.66-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia is a legal state in which all aspects are regulated by applicable law to determine the obligations, rights and obligations in monitoring one's own and social desires. Of course, the existence of applicable laws in Indonesia has a very good influence in order because it can control all kinds of criminal activities that occur in society. This study aims to reveal the form of criminal sanctions and legal considerations given by the panel of judges in imposing a sentence on the perpetrators of the crime of forging letters which were carried out together. This research uses normative legal writing method. Sources of data used are primary and secondary data. Data analysis is used in a qualitative, in-depth and comprehensive way and when analyzing legal materials, namely by argumentation through explaining legal incident materials or legal results in detail to facilitate interpretation in the analysis. The results in the study indicate that in terms of considering the judge's role when giving criminal sanctions to the defendant on behalf of Ahmad Saifudin in the decision Number 305/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt.Tim, in which the defendant was sentenced for what he had done, he was sentenced to 1 year 2 months jail. The conclusion of the study is that joint criminal sanctions in carrying out the criminal act of forging letters together can be imposed as described in Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code regarding the crime of forging letters, threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of six years. The researcher hopes that in deciding a case the judge can consider everything

查看原文本刊更多论文

集体指控法律部(雅加达东部初审法院判例305号/Pid)。B - 2021 - PN Jkt东)。

印度尼西亚是一个法治国家，所有方面都由适用法律规定，以确定监督个人和社会愿望的义务、权利和义务。当然，印度尼西亚适用法律的存在对秩序有非常好的影响，因为它可以控制社会上发生的各种犯罪活动。这项研究的目的是揭示刑事制裁的形式和法官小组在对伪造信件罪行的罪犯判刑时所考虑的法律因素，这些罪行是一起进行的。本研究采用规范的法律写作方法。使用的数据来源是主要和次要数据。在分析法律资料时，采用定性、深入、全面的方法进行数据分析，即通过对法律事件材料或法律结果的详细解释进行论证，以便于分析中的解释。研究结果表明，在第305/Pid号决定中，考虑到法官在代表Ahmad Saifudin对被告进行刑事制裁时的作用。B / 2021 / PN Jkt。在该案中，被告因其所做的事被判入狱1年2个月。这项研究的结论是，可以按照《刑法》第263条第(1)款关于伪造信件罪的规定，对一起伪造信件的犯罪行为施加联合刑事制裁，并以最高六年监禁的威胁。研究者希望法官在判决案件时能考虑到一切

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum

自引率

0.00%

发文量