Automated Diagnosis of Reduced-Lead Electrocardiograms Using a Shared Classifier

H. Jessen, R. V. D. Leur, P. Doevendans, R. V. Es
{"title":"Automated Diagnosis of Reduced-Lead Electrocardiograms Using a Shared Classifier","authors":"H. Jessen, R. V. D. Leur, P. Doevendans, R. V. Es","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portable ECG devices with a reduced number of leads are increasingly being used in clinical practice. As part of the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2021, this study aims to develop an algorithm for automated diagnosis of reduced-lead ECGs. We compared separate baseline classifiers for the different lead-subsets with our newly proposed shared classifier. The different models were pre-trained on a physician-annotated dataset of 269,72612-lead ECGs. Fine-tuning was done on the challenge dataset, consisting of 88,243 ECGs. Even though different models showed promising results on the internal pre-training dataset, optimal scores were achieved by the baseline model on the hidden test set. Our team, UMCU, received scores of 0.47, 0.40, 0.41, 0.41, and 0.41 (ranked 14th, 17th, 17th, 17th, and 16th out of 39 teams) for the 12-lead, 6-lead, 4-lead, 3-lead, and 2-lead versions of the hidden test set.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Portable ECG devices with a reduced number of leads are increasingly being used in clinical practice. As part of the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2021, this study aims to develop an algorithm for automated diagnosis of reduced-lead ECGs. We compared separate baseline classifiers for the different lead-subsets with our newly proposed shared classifier. The different models were pre-trained on a physician-annotated dataset of 269,72612-lead ECGs. Fine-tuning was done on the challenge dataset, consisting of 88,243 ECGs. Even though different models showed promising results on the internal pre-training dataset, optimal scores were achieved by the baseline model on the hidden test set. Our team, UMCU, received scores of 0.47, 0.40, 0.41, 0.41, and 0.41 (ranked 14th, 17th, 17th, 17th, and 16th out of 39 teams) for the 12-lead, 6-lead, 4-lead, 3-lead, and 2-lead versions of the hidden test set.
使用共享分类器的低铅心电图自动诊断
减少导联数量的便携式心电设备越来越多地用于临床实践。作为PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2021的一部分,该研究旨在开发一种自动诊断低导联心电图的算法。我们将不同铅子集的单独基线分类器与我们新提出的共享分类器进行了比较。不同的模型在医生注释的269,72612导联心电图数据集上进行预训练。对挑战数据集进行了微调,该数据集由88,243个心电图组成。尽管不同的模型在内部预训练数据集上显示出很好的结果,但基线模型在隐藏测试集上获得了最优分数。我们的UMCU团队在12-lead, 6-lead, 4-lead, 3-lead和2-lead版本的隐藏测试集中获得了0.47,0.40,0.41,0.41和0.41的分数(在39个团队中排名第14,17,17,17和16)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信