All Appeals Lead to Strasbourg? Unpacking the Impact of the European Court of Human Rights on Russia

Alexei Trochev
{"title":"All Appeals Lead to Strasbourg? Unpacking the Impact of the European Court of Human Rights on Russia","authors":"Alexei Trochev","doi":"10.3200/DEMO.17.2.145-178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author explores how Russian government officials and judges interact with the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and argues that the Russian judiciary may be the most ECtHR-friendly branch of Russian government. Russian judges increasingly refer to the jurisprudence of the ECtHR, despite facing a host of pressures to do otherwise. As a result, the Russian legal system’s adherence to the standards of the 1950 convention is a complicated work in progress that develops in fits and starts and in which those in power wrestle with the question of their legal autonomy to limit the domestication of European human rights standards in Russia’s governance.","PeriodicalId":136724,"journal":{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Wisconsin Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.17.2.145-178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The author explores how Russian government officials and judges interact with the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and argues that the Russian judiciary may be the most ECtHR-friendly branch of Russian government. Russian judges increasingly refer to the jurisprudence of the ECtHR, despite facing a host of pressures to do otherwise. As a result, the Russian legal system’s adherence to the standards of the 1950 convention is a complicated work in progress that develops in fits and starts and in which those in power wrestle with the question of their legal autonomy to limit the domestication of European human rights standards in Russia’s governance.
所有上诉都指向斯特拉斯堡?解读欧洲人权法院对俄罗斯的影响
作者探讨了俄罗斯政府官员和法官如何与欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)互动,并认为俄罗斯司法部门可能是俄罗斯政府中对欧洲人权法院最友好的部门。俄罗斯法官越来越多地参考欧洲人权法院的判例,尽管面临着许多不这样做的压力。因此,俄罗斯法律体系对1950年公约标准的遵守是一项时断时续的复杂工作,在此过程中,当权者与他们的法律自主权问题作斗争,以限制欧洲人权标准在俄罗斯治理中的驯化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信