American “Universal” Values and Russia

A. Tsygankov
{"title":"American “Universal” Values and Russia","authors":"A. Tsygankov","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190919337.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 describes in greater detail the Russia discourse in American mainstream media. It identifies four media narratives of Russia—“transition to democracy” (1991–1995), “chaos” (1995–2005), “neo-Soviet autocracy” (2005–2013), and “foreign enemy” (since 2014). The space for debating Russia in the media has narrowed considerably since the mid-2000s, when Russia’s political system began to be viewed as a nondemocratic and increasingly anti-Western regime. Russia’s values were now viewed as incompatible with and inferior to those of the United States, which rendered relations with the Kremlin difficult, if not impossible. In the 2010s, US officials adopted this view partly from media influence and partly out of their own frustration with the Kremlin’s policies.","PeriodicalId":377610,"journal":{"name":"The Dark Double","volume":"os-45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Dark Double","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190919337.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 3 describes in greater detail the Russia discourse in American mainstream media. It identifies four media narratives of Russia—“transition to democracy” (1991–1995), “chaos” (1995–2005), “neo-Soviet autocracy” (2005–2013), and “foreign enemy” (since 2014). The space for debating Russia in the media has narrowed considerably since the mid-2000s, when Russia’s political system began to be viewed as a nondemocratic and increasingly anti-Western regime. Russia’s values were now viewed as incompatible with and inferior to those of the United States, which rendered relations with the Kremlin difficult, if not impossible. In the 2010s, US officials adopted this view partly from media influence and partly out of their own frustration with the Kremlin’s policies.
美国的“普世”价值观和俄罗斯
第三章更详细地描述了美国主流媒体中的俄罗斯话语。它确定了俄罗斯的四种媒体叙事——“向民主过渡”(1991-1995)、“混乱”(1995-2005)、“新苏联专制”(2005-2013)和“外敌”(2014年以来)。自2000年代中期以来,媒体讨论俄罗斯的空间已经大大缩小,当时俄罗斯的政治制度开始被视为一个非民主的、越来越反西方的政权。俄罗斯的价值观现在被视为与美国的价值观不相容,甚至不如美国的价值观,这使得与克里姆林宫的关系变得困难,如果不是不可能的话。在2010年代,美国官员接受了这种观点,部分原因是媒体的影响,部分原因是他们自己对克里姆林宫的政策感到失望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信