Bayesian Decision Trees for EEG Assessment of newborn brain maturity

L. Jakaite, V. Schetinin, C. Maple, J. Schult
{"title":"Bayesian Decision Trees for EEG Assessment of newborn brain maturity","authors":"L. Jakaite, V. Schetinin, C. Maple, J. Schult","doi":"10.1109/UKCI.2010.5625584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision Tree (DT) models are observable for clinical experts and can be used for a probabilistic inference within Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). The use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) search makes the BMA computationally practical. We employ the MCMC BMA strategy for assessing newborn brain maturity from clinical EEG. Our analysis has revealed that an appreciable part of EEG features is rarely used in the DT models, because these features make weak contribution to the assessment. It was also found that the portion of DT models using weak EEG features was large. On one side, this obstructs interpretation of DT models. On the other side, weak attributes increase dimensionality of a model parameter space that MCMC needs to explore in detail. We assume that discarding the DT models using weak features will reduce these negative impacts. Specifically, in this paper we explore the influence of pruning DTs on the results obtained within the discarding technique we proposed. Our experiments have shown that, given a pruning factor, the original set of EEG features can be greatly reduced without a decrease in accuracy of assessment.","PeriodicalId":403291,"journal":{"name":"2010 UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UKCI.2010.5625584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Decision Tree (DT) models are observable for clinical experts and can be used for a probabilistic inference within Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). The use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) search makes the BMA computationally practical. We employ the MCMC BMA strategy for assessing newborn brain maturity from clinical EEG. Our analysis has revealed that an appreciable part of EEG features is rarely used in the DT models, because these features make weak contribution to the assessment. It was also found that the portion of DT models using weak EEG features was large. On one side, this obstructs interpretation of DT models. On the other side, weak attributes increase dimensionality of a model parameter space that MCMC needs to explore in detail. We assume that discarding the DT models using weak features will reduce these negative impacts. Specifically, in this paper we explore the influence of pruning DTs on the results obtained within the discarding technique we proposed. Our experiments have shown that, given a pruning factor, the original set of EEG features can be greatly reduced without a decrease in accuracy of assessment.
新生儿脑成熟度脑电评估的贝叶斯决策树
决策树(DT)模型对临床专家来说是可观察的,可以用于贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)中的概率推断。马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)搜索的使用使BMA在计算上具有实用性。我们采用MCMC BMA策略从临床脑电图评估新生儿脑成熟度。我们的分析表明,相当一部分EEG特征在DT模型中很少被使用,因为这些特征对评估的贡献很小。使用弱EEG特征的DT模型所占比例也很大。一方面,这阻碍了对DT模型的解释。另一方面,弱属性增加了模型参数空间的维度,MCMC需要对其进行详细的探索。我们假设放弃使用弱特征的DT模型将减少这些负面影响。具体而言,在本文中,我们探讨了修剪dt对我们提出的丢弃技术中获得的结果的影响。我们的实验表明,给定一个修剪因子,可以在不降低评估准确性的情况下大大减少原始EEG特征集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信