Utilization of vibrating mesh nebulizer in the treatment of infants with acute bronchiolitis: A randomized, controlled trial

I-Ping Wu, Ming-Yi Chien, Hsiu-Feng Hsiao, Eric Chen, Yun-Yueh Liu, Chang-Wei Chou, S. Lai
{"title":"Utilization of vibrating mesh nebulizer in the treatment of infants with acute bronchiolitis: A randomized, controlled trial","authors":"I-Ping Wu, Ming-Yi Chien, Hsiu-Feng Hsiao, Eric Chen, Yun-Yueh Liu, Chang-Wei Chou, S. Lai","doi":"10.4103/PRCM.PRCM_17_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bronchiolitis is a disease that is predominantly caused by the infection of peripheral airway due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The occurrence is highly prevalent among childhood stage with seasonal outbreak peak during fall and spring. Treatment of bronchiolitis invariably involves lengthy hospitalization, which places significant socio-economic burden on family caregivers and healthcare system. Aerosolizing hypertonic saline using small-volume jet nebulizer (SVN) remains as one of the effective therapies to alleviate symptoms in infants with acute bronchiolitis. However, such approach not only restraints treatment to hospitalization and can irritate patients with loud noise. It is unclear whether an alternative aerosol therapy that offers similar efficacy yet enhances portability, convenience and quiet operation is available. Materials and Methods: Herein we showed that a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) offered quiet delivery and undisturbed nebulization yet harnessed similar improvement in clinical symptoms in contrast with SVN when treating hospitalized infants with acute bronchiolitis. Results: A total of 64 hospitalized infants (<12 months of age) with acute bronchiolitis were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to SVN (n=32) and VMN (n=32) groups and had received the same aerosol treatment protocol during hospitalization. Besides respiratory rate, the initial overall severity score; hospital stay duration; and intravascular-line day for both groups (SVN vs VMN) were similar. The data were 4.30±1.44 vs 4.92±1.3; 3.97±1.88 vs 3.94±1.66 days; 2.31±1.47 vs 2.16±1.46 days correspondingly. However, a higher satisfaction score (4.8/5) was shown in a corresponding questionnaire indicating user preference in VMN due to enhanced portability, ease of clean and operation, and less-noise. These advantages could potentially facilitate bronchiolitis treatment and follow-up maintenance at home. Conclusion: In sum, the treatment outcome for infants with acute bronchiolitis was equivalent between SVN and VMN. Easy portability and simple operation features of VMN may present a much favored therapeutic option for home care users.","PeriodicalId":273845,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Respirology and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Respirology and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/PRCM.PRCM_17_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Bronchiolitis is a disease that is predominantly caused by the infection of peripheral airway due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The occurrence is highly prevalent among childhood stage with seasonal outbreak peak during fall and spring. Treatment of bronchiolitis invariably involves lengthy hospitalization, which places significant socio-economic burden on family caregivers and healthcare system. Aerosolizing hypertonic saline using small-volume jet nebulizer (SVN) remains as one of the effective therapies to alleviate symptoms in infants with acute bronchiolitis. However, such approach not only restraints treatment to hospitalization and can irritate patients with loud noise. It is unclear whether an alternative aerosol therapy that offers similar efficacy yet enhances portability, convenience and quiet operation is available. Materials and Methods: Herein we showed that a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) offered quiet delivery and undisturbed nebulization yet harnessed similar improvement in clinical symptoms in contrast with SVN when treating hospitalized infants with acute bronchiolitis. Results: A total of 64 hospitalized infants (<12 months of age) with acute bronchiolitis were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to SVN (n=32) and VMN (n=32) groups and had received the same aerosol treatment protocol during hospitalization. Besides respiratory rate, the initial overall severity score; hospital stay duration; and intravascular-line day for both groups (SVN vs VMN) were similar. The data were 4.30±1.44 vs 4.92±1.3; 3.97±1.88 vs 3.94±1.66 days; 2.31±1.47 vs 2.16±1.46 days correspondingly. However, a higher satisfaction score (4.8/5) was shown in a corresponding questionnaire indicating user preference in VMN due to enhanced portability, ease of clean and operation, and less-noise. These advantages could potentially facilitate bronchiolitis treatment and follow-up maintenance at home. Conclusion: In sum, the treatment outcome for infants with acute bronchiolitis was equivalent between SVN and VMN. Easy portability and simple operation features of VMN may present a much favored therapeutic option for home care users.
使用振动网喷雾器治疗婴儿急性细支气管炎:一项随机对照试验
背景:毛细支气管炎是一种主要由呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染周围气道引起的疾病。儿童期发病率高,季节性暴发高峰期为秋季和春季。毛细支气管炎的治疗总是需要长时间的住院治疗,这给家庭照顾者和卫生保健系统带来了重大的社会经济负担。小体积喷射雾化器雾化高渗生理盐水是缓解婴幼儿急性细支气管炎症状的有效方法之一。然而,这种方法不仅限制了住院治疗,而且噪音很大,会刺激患者。目前尚不清楚是否有一种替代的气溶胶疗法可以提供类似的疗效,同时提高便携性、便利性和安静的操作。材料和方法:本研究表明,在治疗急性毛细支气管炎住院婴儿时,振动网状雾化器(VMN)提供安静的输送和不受干扰的雾化,但与SVN相比,在临床症状方面有相似的改善。结果:共纳入64例急性细支气管炎住院婴儿(<12个月)。受试者被随机分为SVN组(n=32)和VMN组(n=32),并在住院期间接受相同的气溶胶治疗方案。除呼吸频率外,初始总严重程度评分;住院时间;两组(SVN vs VMN)的血管内线日相似。数据分别为4.30±1.44 vs 4.92±1.3;3.97±1.88 vs 3.94±1.66天;分别为2.31±1.47天和2.16±1.46天。然而,在相应的问卷调查中显示出更高的满意度得分(4.8/5),表明用户更喜欢VMN,因为它具有更强的便携性,易于清洁和操作,并且噪音更小。这些优点可能会促进细支气管炎的治疗和在家中的后续维护。结论:综上所述,婴儿急性细支气管炎的治疗结果在SVN和VMN之间是相同的。VMN的便携性和简单的操作特点可能为家庭护理用户提供一个非常受欢迎的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信