Choosing MOODLE

Methods and Applications for Advancing Distance Education Technologies Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.4018/978-1-60566-342-5.CH013

B. Stewart, D. Briton, Mike Gismondi, Bob Heller, D. Kennepohl, R. McGreal, C. Nelson

引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstrAct Athabasca University—Canada's Open University evaluated learning management systems (LMS) for use by the university. Evaluative criteria were developed in order to ensure that different platforms were tested against weighted criteria representing the needs of the university. Three LMSs (WebCt, LotusNotes, and Moodle) were selected for the evaluation. Moodle was chosen with 11 first place ratings and with only one third place rating. Lotus Notes was second with five first place ratings. Moodle garnered 40% of the total weighted score with Lotus Notes getting 32%, and WebCT 29%. The first place preferences within individual criteria show the following: WebCT 6; LotusNotes 7; and Moodle 58.

查看原文本刊更多论文

选择MOODLE

阿萨巴斯卡大学-加拿大开放大学评估了该大学使用的学习管理系统(LMS)。制定了评估标准，以确保根据代表大学需求的加权标准对不同的平台进行测试。选择三个lms (WebCt、LotusNotes和Moodle)进行评估。Moodle有11个第一名，只有一个第三名。Lotus Notes排名第二，获得了5个第一名。Moodle获得了总加权分数的40%，Lotus Notes获得32%，WebCT获得29%。个人标准中的第一名偏好显示如下:WebCT 6;LotusNotes 7;和Moodle 58。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Methods and Applications for Advancing Distance Education Technologies

自引率

0.00%

发文量