Analysis of Non-clinical Risk Factors for Heart Disease and Stroke Using Statistical Method

Sri Sumarlinda, Azizah Binti Rahmat, Zalizah Binti Awang Long
{"title":"Analysis of Non-clinical Risk Factors for Heart Disease and Stroke Using Statistical Method","authors":"Sri Sumarlinda, Azizah Binti Rahmat, Zalizah Binti Awang Long","doi":"10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heart disease and stroke are the main contributions to health disorder. Two factors influence the susceptibility of the disease, namely clinical risk factors and non-clinical factors. This study aims to analyze the effect of non-clinical risk factors on the susceptibility to heart disease and stroke. The non-clinical risk factors are stress management, age, obesity, genetics, smoking, gender, lifestyle (nutrition), lifestyle (timing rest), and physical activity. Analysis of the influence of non-clinical risk factors on susceptibility using statistical methods, namely descriptive statistics, normalization tests with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, validity tests, reliability tests, and correlation tests. The descriptive statistical tests show that the risk factors for stress management, obesity, and smoking have a more significant influence than others. While Gender and physical activity have more negligible effect than others. Testing with one sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test shows that the data is normally distributed. Validity testing produces 100% valid data. The reliability test using Cronbach's alpha of 9 non-clinical risk factor items resulted in a value of 0.684, which means reliable. Correlation test between 9 items of non-clinical risk factor shows significant between items.","PeriodicalId":415761,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47701/icohetech.v3i1.2217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart disease and stroke are the main contributions to health disorder. Two factors influence the susceptibility of the disease, namely clinical risk factors and non-clinical factors. This study aims to analyze the effect of non-clinical risk factors on the susceptibility to heart disease and stroke. The non-clinical risk factors are stress management, age, obesity, genetics, smoking, gender, lifestyle (nutrition), lifestyle (timing rest), and physical activity. Analysis of the influence of non-clinical risk factors on susceptibility using statistical methods, namely descriptive statistics, normalization tests with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, validity tests, reliability tests, and correlation tests. The descriptive statistical tests show that the risk factors for stress management, obesity, and smoking have a more significant influence than others. While Gender and physical activity have more negligible effect than others. Testing with one sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test shows that the data is normally distributed. Validity testing produces 100% valid data. The reliability test using Cronbach's alpha of 9 non-clinical risk factor items resulted in a value of 0.684, which means reliable. Correlation test between 9 items of non-clinical risk factor shows significant between items.
用统计学方法分析心脏病和中风的非临床危险因素
心脏病和中风是造成健康失调的主要原因。影响本病易感性的因素有两个,即临床危险因素和非临床因素。本研究旨在分析非临床危险因素对心脏病和脑卒中易感性的影响。非临床风险因素包括压力管理、年龄、肥胖、遗传、吸烟、性别、生活方式(营养)、生活方式(定时休息)和身体活动。使用统计学方法分析非临床危险因素对易感性的影响,即描述性统计、Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验的归一化检验、效度检验、信度检验和相关性检验。描述性统计检验表明,压力管理、肥胖和吸烟的风险因素比其他因素的影响更显著。而性别和体育活动的影响比其他因素更可以忽略不计。单样本Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验表明数据呈正态分布。有效性测试产生100%有效的数据。对9个非临床危险因素项目进行Cronbach’s alpha信度检验,结果为0.684,为可靠。9项非临床危险因素的相关检验显示项目间具有显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信