Driver route choice behavior: Experiences, perceptions, and choices

Aly M. Tawfik, Hesham A Rakha, Shadeequa D. Miller
{"title":"Driver route choice behavior: Experiences, perceptions, and choices","authors":"Aly M. Tawfik, Hesham A Rakha, Shadeequa D. Miller","doi":"10.1109/IVS.2010.5547968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the context of transportation modeling, driver route choice is typically captured using mathematical programming approaches, which assume that drivers, in attempting to minimize some objective function, have full knowledge of the transportation network state. Typically, drivers are assumed to either minimize their travel time (user equilibrium) or minimize the total system travel time (system optimum). Given the dynamic and stochastic nature of the transportation system, the assumption of a driver's perfect knowledge is at best questionable. While it is well documented in psychological sciences that humans tend to minimize their cognitive efforts and follow simple heuristics to reach their decisions, especially under uncertainty and time constraints, current models assume that drivers have perfect or close to perfect knowledge of their choice set, as well as the travel characteristics associated with each of the choice elements. Only a few of the many route choice models that are described in the literature are based on observed human behavior. With this in mind the research presented in this paper monitors and analyzes actual human route choice behavior. It compares actual drivers experiences, perceptions and choices, and demonstrates that (a) drivers perceptions are significantly different from their actual experiences, and that drivers' choices are better explained by their perceptions than their experiences; (b) drivers perceive travel speeds better than travel times (c) perceived travel speeds seem to influence route choice more than perceived travel times, and (d) drivers' route choice behavior differs across different driver groups.","PeriodicalId":123266,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2010.5547968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Within the context of transportation modeling, driver route choice is typically captured using mathematical programming approaches, which assume that drivers, in attempting to minimize some objective function, have full knowledge of the transportation network state. Typically, drivers are assumed to either minimize their travel time (user equilibrium) or minimize the total system travel time (system optimum). Given the dynamic and stochastic nature of the transportation system, the assumption of a driver's perfect knowledge is at best questionable. While it is well documented in psychological sciences that humans tend to minimize their cognitive efforts and follow simple heuristics to reach their decisions, especially under uncertainty and time constraints, current models assume that drivers have perfect or close to perfect knowledge of their choice set, as well as the travel characteristics associated with each of the choice elements. Only a few of the many route choice models that are described in the literature are based on observed human behavior. With this in mind the research presented in this paper monitors and analyzes actual human route choice behavior. It compares actual drivers experiences, perceptions and choices, and demonstrates that (a) drivers perceptions are significantly different from their actual experiences, and that drivers' choices are better explained by their perceptions than their experiences; (b) drivers perceive travel speeds better than travel times (c) perceived travel speeds seem to influence route choice more than perceived travel times, and (d) drivers' route choice behavior differs across different driver groups.
司机路线选择行为:经验、感知和选择
在交通建模的背景下,通常使用数学规划方法捕获驾驶员的路线选择,该方法假设驾驶员在试图最小化某些目标函数时,对交通网络状态有充分的了解。通常,假设司机要么最小化他们的旅行时间(用户平衡),要么最小化系统总旅行时间(系统最优)。考虑到交通系统的动态性和随机性,假设司机拥有完美的知识是值得怀疑的。虽然心理科学中有充分的证据表明,人类倾向于将自己的认知努力最小化,并遵循简单的启发式来做出决定,尤其是在不确定性和时间限制下,但目前的模型假设司机对他们的选择集有完美或接近完美的了解,以及与每个选择元素相关的旅行特征。在文献中描述的许多路径选择模型中,只有少数是基于观察到的人类行为。基于此,本文的研究对人类实际的路径选择行为进行了监测和分析。它比较了实际驾驶员的经验、感知和选择,并证明(a)驾驶员的感知与他们的实际经验有显著不同,驾驶员的选择可以更好地用他们的感知来解释,而不是用他们的经验来解释;(b)驾驶员对行驶速度的感知优于行驶时间;(c)感知的行驶速度似乎比感知的行驶时间更能影响路线选择;(d)驾驶员的路线选择行为在不同驾驶员群体之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信