Similarities and differences between COSO ERM and ISO 31000 - descriptive and content analyzes

G. Rampini, F. Berssaneti
{"title":"Similarities and differences between COSO ERM and ISO 31000 - descriptive and content analyzes","authors":"G. Rampini, F. Berssaneti","doi":"10.14488/enegep2022_tn_st_387_1915_43353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The academic interest on risk management research increased over the last years. What was previously treated in isolation, these days are essential to be treated by the entire company. Thus, the parts that make up the risk processes of the organizations must be studied in a continuous way aiming at optimizing the whole process. Despite having several guidelines, COSO ERM and ISO 31000 are the most accepted by risk management professionals. Therefore, the present article aims to outline a profile on COSO ERM and ISO 31000 into the scientific productions and highlight the main similarities and differences between them. In order to reach the objective, a descriptive and a content analysis was carried out, with samples of documents extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database, from 2017 to 2021. After the analyzes, it was possible to identify the consistent evolution of the publications, diversity of journals interested in the subject, interdisciplinarity between quality management and risk management and finally list differences and similarities between COSO ERM and ISO 31000.","PeriodicalId":145654,"journal":{"name":"Anais do Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14488/enegep2022_tn_st_387_1915_43353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The academic interest on risk management research increased over the last years. What was previously treated in isolation, these days are essential to be treated by the entire company. Thus, the parts that make up the risk processes of the organizations must be studied in a continuous way aiming at optimizing the whole process. Despite having several guidelines, COSO ERM and ISO 31000 are the most accepted by risk management professionals. Therefore, the present article aims to outline a profile on COSO ERM and ISO 31000 into the scientific productions and highlight the main similarities and differences between them. In order to reach the objective, a descriptive and a content analysis was carried out, with samples of documents extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database, from 2017 to 2021. After the analyzes, it was possible to identify the consistent evolution of the publications, diversity of journals interested in the subject, interdisciplinarity between quality management and risk management and finally list differences and similarities between COSO ERM and ISO 31000.
COSO ERM与ISO 31000的异同——描述与内容分析
近年来,学术界对风险管理研究的兴趣日益浓厚。以前孤立治疗的疾病,现在必须由整个公司来治疗。因此,必须以持续的方式研究构成组织风险过程的各个部分,以优化整个过程。尽管有几个指导方针,COSO ERM和ISO 31000是最被风险管理专业人员接受的。因此,本文旨在概述COSO ERM和ISO 31000在科学生产中的概况,并突出它们之间的主要异同。为了达到这一目标,我们对2017年至2021年从Web of Science Core Collection数据库中提取的文件样本进行了描述性和内容分析。经过分析,可以确定出版物的一致演变,对该主题感兴趣的期刊的多样性,质量管理和风险管理之间的跨学科性,并最终列出COSO ERM与ISO 31000之间的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信