EVALUATION OF FAMILY MEDICINE PRACTICE FROM THE INDIVIDUAL PERSPECTIVE: A RESEARCH IN BITLIS

Ayatullah Yildiz, Tezcan Şahi̇n
{"title":"EVALUATION OF FAMILY MEDICINE PRACTICE FROM THE INDIVIDUAL PERSPECTIVE: A RESEARCH IN BITLIS","authors":"Ayatullah Yildiz, Tezcan Şahi̇n","doi":"10.52831/kjhs.1159842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was conducted to reveal the evaluations of individuals living in Bitlis about family physicians and family medicine practice and to determine the differences in demographic information. \nMethod: Models and hypotheses created in accordance with the purpose of the research were analyzed with quantitative methods. The research data were obtained through a face-to-face questionnaire by interviewing 433 people. Because of the normal distribution of the data, analyzes were performed using parametric tests. A cross-sectional study was conducted and data were collected in March-April 2019. Descriptive statistics were included and Anova and independent sample t-tests were used to detect differences. \nResults: When the attitudes of the participants towards family physicians are examined; it was determined that the majority of them knew their family physicians and evaluated their approach to them positively, but the frequency of going to family medicine was generally low. It was determined that they preferred physicians other than these physicians, although they did not change or do not intend to change their family physician. In addition, it was determined that the majority of the participants preferred family physicians because the family health centers were close to them. According to the findings, it was concluded that the attitude levels of the participants who were younger, high school graduates and had no children were statistically significantly lower than the others. According to the findings, it was concluded that the attitude levels of the young, high school graduates, and non-children were statistically significantly lower than the others; those who are married, recommend a family doctor and have a higher income than others have higher attitude levels. \nConclusions: In order to increase the rate of going to the family doctor in case of any illness and to create a healthy referral chain, the reasons for not going to the family doctor should be investigated first. Thus, it will be possible for the health system to work effectively and reduce the burden of secondary and tertiary health institutions.","PeriodicalId":212263,"journal":{"name":"Karya Journal of Health Science","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karya Journal of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1159842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to reveal the evaluations of individuals living in Bitlis about family physicians and family medicine practice and to determine the differences in demographic information. Method: Models and hypotheses created in accordance with the purpose of the research were analyzed with quantitative methods. The research data were obtained through a face-to-face questionnaire by interviewing 433 people. Because of the normal distribution of the data, analyzes were performed using parametric tests. A cross-sectional study was conducted and data were collected in March-April 2019. Descriptive statistics were included and Anova and independent sample t-tests were used to detect differences. Results: When the attitudes of the participants towards family physicians are examined; it was determined that the majority of them knew their family physicians and evaluated their approach to them positively, but the frequency of going to family medicine was generally low. It was determined that they preferred physicians other than these physicians, although they did not change or do not intend to change their family physician. In addition, it was determined that the majority of the participants preferred family physicians because the family health centers were close to them. According to the findings, it was concluded that the attitude levels of the participants who were younger, high school graduates and had no children were statistically significantly lower than the others. According to the findings, it was concluded that the attitude levels of the young, high school graduates, and non-children were statistically significantly lower than the others; those who are married, recommend a family doctor and have a higher income than others have higher attitude levels. Conclusions: In order to increase the rate of going to the family doctor in case of any illness and to create a healthy referral chain, the reasons for not going to the family doctor should be investigated first. Thus, it will be possible for the health system to work effectively and reduce the burden of secondary and tertiary health institutions.
个体视角下的家庭医学实践评价:一项基于bitlis的研究
目的:本研究旨在揭示比特里斯居民对家庭医生和家庭医学实践的评价,并确定人口学信息的差异。方法:根据研究目的建立模型和假设,采用定量方法进行分析。研究数据通过对433人的面对面问卷调查获得。由于数据呈正态分布,因此采用参数检验进行分析。2019年3月至4月进行了横断面研究并收集了数据。采用描述性统计,并采用方差分析和独立样本t检验来检测差异。结果:被调查者对家庭医生的态度;结果表明,大多数儿童认识自己的家庭医生,并积极评价他们的治疗方法,但去看家庭医生的频率普遍较低。确定他们更喜欢医生而不是这些医生,尽管他们没有改变或不打算改变他们的家庭医生。此外,确定大多数参与者更喜欢家庭医生,因为家庭保健中心离他们很近。根据研究结果,研究人员得出结论,年龄较小、高中毕业、没有孩子的参与者的态度水平在统计上明显低于其他人。研究发现,青少年、高中毕业生和非子女的态度水平在统计学上显著低于其他人群;那些已婚、推荐家庭医生、收入较高的人的态度水平更高。结论:为了提高家庭医生就诊率,建立健康的转诊链,应首先调查不去家庭医生就诊的原因。因此,卫生系统将有可能有效地开展工作,并减轻二级和三级卫生机构的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信