Were Cicero’s Philippics the Cause of his Death?

Tom Keeline
{"title":"Were Cicero’s Philippics the Cause of his Death?","authors":"Tom Keeline","doi":"10.1515/9783110716313-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"a of men who must be put to death, more than two hundred in number. proscription of Cicero, however, caused the most strife in their debates, Antony con-senting to no terms unless Cicero should be the first man to be put to death, Lepidus siding with Antony, and Octavian holding out against them both. [ … ] It is said that for the first two days kept up struggle to save Cicero, but yielded on the third day and gave up.","PeriodicalId":225196,"journal":{"name":"Reading Cicero’s Final Years","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Cicero’s Final Years","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110716313-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

a of men who must be put to death, more than two hundred in number. proscription of Cicero, however, caused the most strife in their debates, Antony con-senting to no terms unless Cicero should be the first man to be put to death, Lepidus siding with Antony, and Octavian holding out against them both. [ … ] It is said that for the first two days kept up struggle to save Cicero, but yielded on the third day and gave up.
西塞罗的《Philippics》是他死亡的原因吗?
必须处死的人有二百多人。然而,对西塞罗的监禁却在他们的辩论中引起了最大的冲突,安敦尼不同意任何条件,除非西塞罗首先被处死,雷必达站在安敦尼一边,屋大维则反对他们两人。据说前两天他一直在为救西塞罗而斗争,但第三天就屈服了,放弃了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信