A biomechanical evaluation of the stability of small and large diameter dental implants: preliminary study

H. Kido, A. Kumar, E. Schulz, J. Lozada, S. Saha
{"title":"A biomechanical evaluation of the stability of small and large diameter dental implants: preliminary study","authors":"H. Kido, A. Kumar, E. Schulz, J. Lozada, S. Saha","doi":"10.1109/SBEC.1996.493152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare the immediate implant mobility and the pull-out resistance of large diameter dental implant (4.5 mm) with a standard size (3.25 mm) implant. Two groups consisting of 18 implants, were placed in 5 embalmed human mandibles. The result of Periotest showed the same initial stability for the two groups. The maximum pull-out force for large diameter implants was 16% greater than that for the small diameter implants, although this difference was not statistically significant. There were significant positive correlation (p<0.05, p<0.01) between the pull-out force and the bone density for the large and small diameter implants.","PeriodicalId":294120,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1996 Fifteenth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1996 Fifteenth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBEC.1996.493152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the immediate implant mobility and the pull-out resistance of large diameter dental implant (4.5 mm) with a standard size (3.25 mm) implant. Two groups consisting of 18 implants, were placed in 5 embalmed human mandibles. The result of Periotest showed the same initial stability for the two groups. The maximum pull-out force for large diameter implants was 16% greater than that for the small diameter implants, although this difference was not statistically significant. There were significant positive correlation (p<0.05, p<0.01) between the pull-out force and the bone density for the large and small diameter implants.
小直径和大直径种植体稳定性的生物力学评价:初步研究
本研究的目的是比较大直径种植体(4.5 mm)与标准尺寸种植体(3.25 mm)种植体的即刻移动性和拔出阻力。两组共18个种植体,放置于5个防腐人下颌骨。Periotest结果显示两组的初始稳定性相同。大直径种植体的最大拔出力比小直径种植体大16%,尽管这种差异没有统计学意义。大、小直径种植体的拔牙力与骨密度呈显著正相关(p<0.05, p<0.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信