Systemic Factors Impacting Mortality and End-of-Life Issues in Critical Care

Leo Mercer, Valerie Canary, Michelle E. Maxson
{"title":"Systemic Factors Impacting Mortality and End-of-Life Issues in Critical Care","authors":"Leo Mercer, Valerie Canary, Michelle E. Maxson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190077013.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews issues related to mortality in the intensive care setting. Relevant literature is summarized and emphasizes the common need patients have for more frequent assessment, dependency on technology support, and psychosocial intervention. The authors stress the importance of interdisciplinary teams and the unique staffing and workforce challenges they encounter. Despite agreement on its importance, the authors maintain that end-of-life care is associated with a lack of consensus around its implementation at the bedside. The diversity within patient groups, diseases and conditions, and health care providers results in an environment in which the interplay of a growing number of variables influences the engagement of patients and families in discussions about end-of-life planning and care, futility, palliation, or withdrawal of support.","PeriodicalId":445464,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Psychology and Rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Psychology and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190077013.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter reviews issues related to mortality in the intensive care setting. Relevant literature is summarized and emphasizes the common need patients have for more frequent assessment, dependency on technology support, and psychosocial intervention. The authors stress the importance of interdisciplinary teams and the unique staffing and workforce challenges they encounter. Despite agreement on its importance, the authors maintain that end-of-life care is associated with a lack of consensus around its implementation at the bedside. The diversity within patient groups, diseases and conditions, and health care providers results in an environment in which the interplay of a growing number of variables influences the engagement of patients and families in discussions about end-of-life planning and care, futility, palliation, or withdrawal of support.
影响重症监护死亡率和生命末期问题的系统性因素
本章回顾了重症监护环境中与死亡率相关的问题。总结了相关文献,并强调了患者对更频繁的评估、对技术支持的依赖和心理社会干预的共同需求。作者强调了跨学科团队的重要性,以及他们遇到的独特的人员配备和劳动力挑战。尽管人们对临终关怀的重要性达成了共识,但作者认为,临终关怀与在床边实施临终关怀缺乏共识有关。患者群体、疾病和病症以及医疗保健提供者之间的多样性导致了一种环境,在这种环境中,越来越多的变量相互作用影响着患者和家属参与有关临终规划和护理、无效、姑息治疗或退出支持的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信