Assessment of Household Cement Consumption Pattern in Pokhara Metropolitan City

A. Mishra
{"title":"Assessment of Household Cement Consumption Pattern in Pokhara Metropolitan City","authors":"A. Mishra","doi":"10.24321/2456.9925.202102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cement is a major construction material used in civil engineering works due to which its demand is very high. A proper cement brand selection is a tough task. Different brands have different pricing and quality because they are from different origin and industries. The consumers and suppliers of the cement market may feel that every brand they are buying and selling is of good quality. Most of the cement may conform to the minimum standard for use. The study has been focused to assess the consumption of different cement brands available in the Pokhara metropolitan city. To carry out the research, cement supplier’s data and field data were collected. Consumers within the study area were considered during the survey. Visual inspection of maximum sites was done. The different brands of cement in use at the site were examined by field survey and analysis was done on SPSS software to obtain the results. Maximum cement consumers choose Shivam (30%) in OPC type and Brij cement (25%) in PPC type. During the selection of the cement, consumers are mainly affected by contractors with (35%) without any quality test of cement. 15% of the cement consumers don’t know about the brand of cement they are using in their household construction. 77.50% of the consumers don’t do quality assurance with engineers during household construction. 70% of the cement consumers are unknown about the concrete ratio in structural members. 97.5% of the cement consumers are unaware of the manufacturing date. Only 12.50% of the cement consumers are affected by advertisement of cement. 80% of the RMC company uses Shivam cement and 20% uses Argakhachi cement. A positive increasing trend of annual cement consumption is seen from 2070 BS to 2076 BS. Cement consumption forecasting for 2080 BS would be 289942.089 metric ton with upper bound and lower bound consumption being 209742.725 metric ton and 370141.450 metric ton respectively. Cement consumption from RMC suppliers in the study area in 2080 BS would be 49125.005 metric ton with upper bound and lower bound consumption being 59572.830 metric ton and 38677.190 metric ton respectively.","PeriodicalId":267306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Construction and Urban Architecture","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Construction and Urban Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24321/2456.9925.202102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cement is a major construction material used in civil engineering works due to which its demand is very high. A proper cement brand selection is a tough task. Different brands have different pricing and quality because they are from different origin and industries. The consumers and suppliers of the cement market may feel that every brand they are buying and selling is of good quality. Most of the cement may conform to the minimum standard for use. The study has been focused to assess the consumption of different cement brands available in the Pokhara metropolitan city. To carry out the research, cement supplier’s data and field data were collected. Consumers within the study area were considered during the survey. Visual inspection of maximum sites was done. The different brands of cement in use at the site were examined by field survey and analysis was done on SPSS software to obtain the results. Maximum cement consumers choose Shivam (30%) in OPC type and Brij cement (25%) in PPC type. During the selection of the cement, consumers are mainly affected by contractors with (35%) without any quality test of cement. 15% of the cement consumers don’t know about the brand of cement they are using in their household construction. 77.50% of the consumers don’t do quality assurance with engineers during household construction. 70% of the cement consumers are unknown about the concrete ratio in structural members. 97.5% of the cement consumers are unaware of the manufacturing date. Only 12.50% of the cement consumers are affected by advertisement of cement. 80% of the RMC company uses Shivam cement and 20% uses Argakhachi cement. A positive increasing trend of annual cement consumption is seen from 2070 BS to 2076 BS. Cement consumption forecasting for 2080 BS would be 289942.089 metric ton with upper bound and lower bound consumption being 209742.725 metric ton and 370141.450 metric ton respectively. Cement consumption from RMC suppliers in the study area in 2080 BS would be 49125.005 metric ton with upper bound and lower bound consumption being 59572.830 metric ton and 38677.190 metric ton respectively.
博卡拉市居民水泥消费模式评价
水泥是土木工程中使用的主要建筑材料,需求量很大。选择合适的水泥牌号是一项艰巨的任务。不同的品牌有不同的价格和质量,因为它们来自不同的产地和行业。水泥市场的消费者和供应商可能会觉得他们购买和销售的每个品牌都是质量好的。大多数水泥可符合使用的最低标准。这项研究的重点是评估博卡拉市不同水泥品牌的消费量。为了进行研究,收集了水泥供应商的数据和现场数据。在调查期间考虑了研究区域内的消费者。对大部分地点进行了目视检查。对现场使用的不同牌号水泥进行实地调查,并利用SPSS软件进行分析,得出结果。在OPC类型中,最多的水泥消费者选择Shivam(30%),在PPC类型中选择Brij水泥(25%)。在选择水泥时,消费者主要受到承包商的影响,(35%)承包商没有对水泥进行任何质量检测。15%的水泥消费者不知道他们在家庭建筑中使用的水泥的品牌。77.50%的消费者在房屋施工过程中没有与工程师进行质量保证。70%的水泥消费者不知道结构构件中的混凝土配比。97.5%的水泥消费者不知道生产日期。只有12.50%的水泥消费者受到水泥广告的影响。RMC公司80%使用Shivam水泥,20%使用Argakhachi水泥。从2070年到2076年,水泥年消耗量呈正增长趋势。2080年BS的水泥消费量预测为289942.089公吨,上限和下限消费量分别为209742.725公吨和370141.450公吨。2080年研究区域RMC供应商的水泥消费量将为49125.005公吨,上限和下限消费量分别为59572.830公吨和38677.190公吨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信