Comparative Analysis of TQM and CMMI

Baiqiao Huang, Guodong Qin, Peng Zhang
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of TQM and CMMI","authors":"Baiqiao Huang, Guodong Qin, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.1109/QR2MSE46217.2019.9021117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is the consensus of people that improving product quality by improving management, but the management standards adopted in different fields are not the same, which is easy to be confused. As to the current status of different quality management standards and methods used in different business areas, this paper analyzes the development history of the general quality management system in the production field and the core concept of total quality management(TQM), compares it with the CMMI standard of quality management in the system development field, analyzes each other’s strengths and weaknesses, and proposes suggestions for improving the deficiencies of CMMI. Finally, the relationship between TQM, CMMI and system engineering (SE) is analyzed, and concludes that the integration with model-based system engineering(MBSE) will be the new direction of CMMI’s future development.","PeriodicalId":233855,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QR2MSE46217.2019.9021117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is the consensus of people that improving product quality by improving management, but the management standards adopted in different fields are not the same, which is easy to be confused. As to the current status of different quality management standards and methods used in different business areas, this paper analyzes the development history of the general quality management system in the production field and the core concept of total quality management(TQM), compares it with the CMMI standard of quality management in the system development field, analyzes each other’s strengths and weaknesses, and proposes suggestions for improving the deficiencies of CMMI. Finally, the relationship between TQM, CMMI and system engineering (SE) is analyzed, and concludes that the integration with model-based system engineering(MBSE) will be the new direction of CMMI’s future development.
TQM与CMMI的比较分析
通过提高管理来提高产品质量是人们的共识,但不同领域采用的管理标准不尽相同,容易造成混淆。针对不同业务领域采用的不同质量管理标准和方法的现状,本文分析了生产领域通用质量管理体系的发展历史和全面质量管理(TQM)的核心概念,并将其与体系开发领域的质量管理CMMI标准进行了比较,分析了各自的优缺点,提出了改进CMMI不足的建议。最后,分析了全面质量管理、CMMI和系统工程(SE)之间的关系,认为与基于模型的系统工程(MBSE)的融合将是CMMI未来发展的新方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信