Incertezze giurisprudenziali sul momento di produzione degli effetti della sentenza civile

F. Simoncini
{"title":"Incertezze giurisprudenziali sul momento di produzione degli effetti della sentenza civile","authors":"F. Simoncini","doi":"10.36253/lng-1822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the state of the jurisprudence of legitimacy on the issue of when a civil judgment produces its declaratory and constitutive effects. After reconstructing the main interventions on the two \"systems of rules\" that have allowed the Court to take a position on this question (Article 282 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the provisional enforceability of the judgment, and the provisions on the suspension of proceedings, useful for identifying the moment in which the extra-trial constraint of the decision is triggered), the author notes the existence of contradictions between jurisprudential orientations, not yet completely overcome. Finally, some problematic reflections are made on a possible research itinerary regarding the “soft” effectiveness of the non-final civil judgment.","PeriodicalId":152289,"journal":{"name":"La Nuova Giuridica","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La Nuova Giuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/lng-1822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyses the state of the jurisprudence of legitimacy on the issue of when a civil judgment produces its declaratory and constitutive effects. After reconstructing the main interventions on the two "systems of rules" that have allowed the Court to take a position on this question (Article 282 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the provisional enforceability of the judgment, and the provisions on the suspension of proceedings, useful for identifying the moment in which the extra-trial constraint of the decision is triggered), the author notes the existence of contradictions between jurisprudential orientations, not yet completely overcome. Finally, some problematic reflections are made on a possible research itinerary regarding the “soft” effectiveness of the non-final civil judgment.
《判例法》中关于民事判决产生影响的时间的不确定因素
本文分析了民事判决何时产生宣告效力和构成效力问题的合法性法学研究现状。在对允许法院在这个问题上采取立场的两种“规则体系”(《民事诉讼法》第282条,关于判决的临时可执行性,以及关于暂停诉讼程序的规定,有助于确定判决的审外约束的触发时刻)的主要干预进行了重新分析之后,作者注意到法理学取向之间存在矛盾。还没有完全克服。最后,对非终审民事判决“软”效力的可能研究路线进行了一些问题思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信