GEOGRAPHICAL MATTER: SUBSTANCE AND ATTRIBUTES

V. Stolbov
{"title":"GEOGRAPHICAL MATTER: SUBSTANCE AND ATTRIBUTES","authors":"V. Stolbov","doi":"10.35634/2412-9518-2022-32-2-216-228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the consideration of one of the urgent problems of modern geography - the substantiation of its philosophical and theoretical-methodological foundations, the definition of its own object of research and, accordingly, the concretization of its place in the system of modern scientific knowledge. Uncertainty, or rather, the presence of numerous and sometimes contradictory points of view on these issues today, deprives science not only of significant heuristic, but also of enormous practical value. The diversity of views on geography as a science, even among specialists, does not contribute to the consolidation of knowledge, prevents the formation of a unified conceptual and terminological apparatus and, worst of all, generates a frivolous attitude to the constructive possibilities of this branch of knowledge. As a system of practical values, geography needs to demonstrate a worthy theoretical foundation, a powerful ideological justification and broad philosophical support. Throughout the existence of ancient science, similar attempts have been made repeatedly. They were carried out both from the standpoint of philosophy and by representatives of the geographical community. A very brief summary of these views is given in the article. The author's own point of view on the problem is also presented. It is emphasized that the unresolved basic, fundamental issues deepen the gap between the natural and social branches of geography, contradict the logic of the development of science, and do not fit into the mainstream of the needs of modern society.","PeriodicalId":131329,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Biology. Earth Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Biology. Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9518-2022-32-2-216-228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of one of the urgent problems of modern geography - the substantiation of its philosophical and theoretical-methodological foundations, the definition of its own object of research and, accordingly, the concretization of its place in the system of modern scientific knowledge. Uncertainty, or rather, the presence of numerous and sometimes contradictory points of view on these issues today, deprives science not only of significant heuristic, but also of enormous practical value. The diversity of views on geography as a science, even among specialists, does not contribute to the consolidation of knowledge, prevents the formation of a unified conceptual and terminological apparatus and, worst of all, generates a frivolous attitude to the constructive possibilities of this branch of knowledge. As a system of practical values, geography needs to demonstrate a worthy theoretical foundation, a powerful ideological justification and broad philosophical support. Throughout the existence of ancient science, similar attempts have been made repeatedly. They were carried out both from the standpoint of philosophy and by representatives of the geographical community. A very brief summary of these views is given in the article. The author's own point of view on the problem is also presented. It is emphasized that the unresolved basic, fundamental issues deepen the gap between the natural and social branches of geography, contradict the logic of the development of science, and do not fit into the mainstream of the needs of modern society.
地理物质:物质和属性
本文致力于思考现代地理学的一个紧迫问题——哲学和理论方法论基础的确证,其研究对象的界定,以及其在现代科学知识体系中的具体地位。不确定性,或者更确切地说,今天在这些问题上存在着大量的、有时是相互矛盾的观点,不仅剥夺了科学的重要启发式,而且剥夺了科学的巨大实用价值。即使在专家之间,对地理作为一门科学的不同看法也无助于知识的巩固,阻碍了统一概念和术语工具的形成,最糟糕的是,对这一知识分支的建设性可能性产生了一种轻佻的态度。地理学作为一种实践价值体系,需要有值得信赖的理论基础、强有力的思想依据和广泛的哲学支撑。纵观古代科学的存在,类似的尝试已经反复进行。它们是由哲学的观点和地理学界的代表进行的。这篇文章对这些观点作了一个非常简短的总结。并就这一问题提出了自己的看法。强调未解决的基本问题加深了地理学的自然分支与社会分支之间的鸿沟,与科学发展的逻辑相矛盾,也不符合现代社会的主流需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信