Performance Analysis and Functionality Comparison of FHRP Protocols

Usman Anwar, Jing Teng, H. Umair, Ammar Sikander
{"title":"Performance Analysis and Functionality Comparison of FHRP Protocols","authors":"Usman Anwar, Jing Teng, H. Umair, Ammar Sikander","doi":"10.1109/ICCSN.2019.8905333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this era, every field requires high availability of network with the least probability of data loss. Therefore, redundancy should be involved as much as possible for network design. However, the high availability of network necessitates higher managerial and operational cost. Redundancy protocols substantially help to solve the problem. First Hop Redundancy Protocols (FHRPs) are implemented to overcome traffic loss from source to destination in network communications. The FHRP consists of different types of protocols. Each protocol has its own purpose and has its own advantages and disadvantages. These protocols assist specific association to successfully transmit the traffic from source to goal without loss of numerous packet. The FHRP includes different kind of protocols but contains three main protocols. in this paper evaluates three particular protocols of FHRPs, namely the Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP), Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP), and Gateway Load Balancing (GLBP). In this paper, we evaluate the three FHRPs by using GNS3 tool. The performances of the three FHRP protocols are analyzed and their functionalities are compared.","PeriodicalId":330766,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSN.2019.8905333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In this era, every field requires high availability of network with the least probability of data loss. Therefore, redundancy should be involved as much as possible for network design. However, the high availability of network necessitates higher managerial and operational cost. Redundancy protocols substantially help to solve the problem. First Hop Redundancy Protocols (FHRPs) are implemented to overcome traffic loss from source to destination in network communications. The FHRP consists of different types of protocols. Each protocol has its own purpose and has its own advantages and disadvantages. These protocols assist specific association to successfully transmit the traffic from source to goal without loss of numerous packet. The FHRP includes different kind of protocols but contains three main protocols. in this paper evaluates three particular protocols of FHRPs, namely the Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP), Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP), and Gateway Load Balancing (GLBP). In this paper, we evaluate the three FHRPs by using GNS3 tool. The performances of the three FHRP protocols are analyzed and their functionalities are compared.
FHRP协议性能分析与功能比较
在这个时代,每个领域都要求网络的高可用性和最小的数据丢失概率。因此,在网络设计中应尽可能多地考虑冗余。然而,网络的高可用性要求更高的管理和运营成本。冗余协议实质上有助于解决这个问题。第一跳冗余协议(First Hop Redundancy protocol, fhrp)是为了克服网络通信中从源到目的的流量丢失而实现的。FHRP由不同类型的协议组成。每个协议都有自己的目的,有自己的优点和缺点。这些协议帮助特定的关联成功地将流量从源传输到目标,而不会丢失大量数据包。FHRP包含不同类型的协议,但主要包含三个协议。本文评估了fhrp的三种特殊协议,即热备路由器协议(HSRP)、虚拟路由器冗余协议(VRRP)和网关负载均衡(GLBP)。本文采用GNS3工具对3种FHRPs进行了评价。分析了三种FHRP协议的性能,并对其功能进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信