The Multiphasic Sex Inventory: Diagnosis and prediction of treatment response in child sexual abusers

L. Simkins, W. Ward, S. Bowman, C. Rinck
{"title":"The Multiphasic Sex Inventory: Diagnosis and prediction of treatment response in child sexual abusers","authors":"L. Simkins, W. Ward, S. Bowman, C. Rinck","doi":"10.1177/107906328900200302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of the Multiphasic Sex Inventory (MSI) in predicting treatment progress and therapy outcome of child sexual abuse perpetrators and to examine the diagnostic potential of this instrument for differentiating perpetrator characteristics. The MSI was administered to 122 clients prior to their entry into therapy and again at three month intervals for nine months. No significant changes in MSI scales were found during the nine month period. Retest correlations on the initial test and the first three month retest period ranged from .42 to .84 with an average of .71. Using the initial MSI scores as predictors, the MSI was able to predict between 30% and 47% of treatment variance, depending on what measure was used as a criterion. It was able to differentiate between treatment outcome (success vs. failure) with 70.9% accuracy. The Sexual Assault, Aggravated Assault, Cognitive Distortion/Immaturity, Lie, and Sex Knowledge Scales were the most salient variables in predicting treatment progress and outcome. A factor analysis of the MSI Scales yielded four factors: Assault, Sexual Fantasy, Denial/Dysfunction, and Normal. The Assault Factor accounted for the largest proportion of variance. Results also indicated that the MSI could 1) differentiate among abusers who molest males, females, and both sexes and 2) among abusers who molest only intrafamilial victims, only extrafamilial victims, and those who molest both kinds of victims. The MSI is also an excellent instrument for differentiating between deniers and non-deniers of abuse. The implications of the MSI as an instrument measuring denial is discussed and an MSI profile of a successful therapy candidate is sketched.","PeriodicalId":340989,"journal":{"name":"Annals of sex research","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of sex research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/107906328900200302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of the Multiphasic Sex Inventory (MSI) in predicting treatment progress and therapy outcome of child sexual abuse perpetrators and to examine the diagnostic potential of this instrument for differentiating perpetrator characteristics. The MSI was administered to 122 clients prior to their entry into therapy and again at three month intervals for nine months. No significant changes in MSI scales were found during the nine month period. Retest correlations on the initial test and the first three month retest period ranged from .42 to .84 with an average of .71. Using the initial MSI scores as predictors, the MSI was able to predict between 30% and 47% of treatment variance, depending on what measure was used as a criterion. It was able to differentiate between treatment outcome (success vs. failure) with 70.9% accuracy. The Sexual Assault, Aggravated Assault, Cognitive Distortion/Immaturity, Lie, and Sex Knowledge Scales were the most salient variables in predicting treatment progress and outcome. A factor analysis of the MSI Scales yielded four factors: Assault, Sexual Fantasy, Denial/Dysfunction, and Normal. The Assault Factor accounted for the largest proportion of variance. Results also indicated that the MSI could 1) differentiate among abusers who molest males, females, and both sexes and 2) among abusers who molest only intrafamilial victims, only extrafamilial victims, and those who molest both kinds of victims. The MSI is also an excellent instrument for differentiating between deniers and non-deniers of abuse. The implications of the MSI as an instrument measuring denial is discussed and an MSI profile of a successful therapy candidate is sketched.
多相性量表:儿童性侵犯者治疗反应的诊断和预测
本研究的目的是确定多相性量表(MSI)在预测儿童性虐待犯罪者的治疗进展和治疗结果方面的效用,并检验该工具在区分犯罪者特征方面的诊断潜力。122名患者在接受治疗前进行了MSI测试,每隔3个月进行一次,持续9个月。在9个月的时间里,MSI量表没有明显的变化。首次复测与前三个月复测的相关性为0.42 ~ 0.84,平均值为0.71。使用初始MSI分数作为预测因子,MSI能够预测30%至47%的治疗方差,这取决于使用什么测量作为标准。它能够区分治疗结果(成功与失败),准确率为70.9%。性侵犯量表、加重性侵犯量表、认知扭曲/不成熟量表、谎言量表和性知识量表是预测治疗进展和结果的最显著变量。MSI量表的因素分析得出四个因素:侵犯、性幻想、否认/功能障碍和正常。攻击因子占方差的最大比例。结果还表明,MSI可以区分骚扰男性、女性和两性的施虐者,以及只骚扰家庭内受害者、只骚扰家庭外受害者和同时骚扰两种受害者的施虐者。MSI也是区分否认和不否认滥用的极好工具。讨论了MSI作为一种测量拒绝的工具的含义,并概述了成功治疗候选人的MSI概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信