KUMULASI GUGATAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DAN GUGATAN WANPRESTASI DALAM KAJIAN HUKUM ACARA PERDATA DI INDONESIA

Rai Mantili, S. Sutanto
{"title":"KUMULASI GUGATAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DAN GUGATAN WANPRESTASI DALAM KAJIAN HUKUM ACARA PERDATA DI INDONESIA","authors":"Rai Mantili, S. Sutanto","doi":"10.28932/DI.V10I2.1210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the integration of lawsuits in breach of law or breach of contract which often found in court examination practice. First issue will analyze whether the integration of lawsuits can be conducted between breach of law and breach of contract claims pursuant to Indonesian Civil Procedures. The second issue will analyze the legal consideration of judges who reject the integration of lawsuits between breach of law and breach of contract claims pursuant to Indonesian Civil Procedures \n  \nThere are some of opinions of judges or expert against the integration of lawsuits between breach of law and breach of contract claims. A jurisprudence states that the integration of lawsuit between breach of law and breach of contract claim in lawsuit is violating the code of conduct since both shall be examined respectively. HIR, RBG and RV does not strictly stipulate and prohibit the integration of lawsuit, however, pursuant to Jurisprudence of The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1875K/Pdt/1984 dated April 24, 1986, “the integration of lawsuits between the breach of law and breach of contract claims cannot be conducted since it is violating the civil procedures and accordingly it shall be examined respectively. In accordance with such jurisprudence, the Judex Jurist is authorized to declare that the integration of lawsuits between the breach of law and breach of contract claims is unacceptable lawsuit (NO/niet oontvankelijk verklaard).     ","PeriodicalId":246508,"journal":{"name":"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28932/DI.V10I2.1210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article describes the integration of lawsuits in breach of law or breach of contract which often found in court examination practice. First issue will analyze whether the integration of lawsuits can be conducted between breach of law and breach of contract claims pursuant to Indonesian Civil Procedures. The second issue will analyze the legal consideration of judges who reject the integration of lawsuits between breach of law and breach of contract claims pursuant to Indonesian Civil Procedures   There are some of opinions of judges or expert against the integration of lawsuits between breach of law and breach of contract claims. A jurisprudence states that the integration of lawsuit between breach of law and breach of contract claim in lawsuit is violating the code of conduct since both shall be examined respectively. HIR, RBG and RV does not strictly stipulate and prohibit the integration of lawsuit, however, pursuant to Jurisprudence of The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1875K/Pdt/1984 dated April 24, 1986, “the integration of lawsuits between the breach of law and breach of contract claims cannot be conducted since it is violating the civil procedures and accordingly it shall be examined respectively. In accordance with such jurisprudence, the Judex Jurist is authorized to declare that the integration of lawsuits between the breach of law and breach of contract claims is unacceptable lawsuit (NO/niet oontvankelijk verklaard).     
印尼民事诉讼和民事诉讼的累积性
本文介绍了法院审查实践中经常遇到的违法、违约诉讼一体化问题。第一期将根据印尼民事诉讼程序分析违约与违约索赔是否可以进行一体化诉讼。第二部分将根据《印尼民事诉讼法》分析法官对违约与违约索赔合并诉讼的法律考虑。法官或专家对违约与违约索赔合并诉讼有一些反对意见。某法理学认为,违约行为与诉讼中的违约索赔相结合是违反行为准则的行为,应当分别进行审查。HIR、RBG和RV并没有严格规定和禁止诉讼一体化,但根据印度尼西亚共和国最高法院1986年4月24日第1875K/Pdt/1984号判例,“违约与违约索赔之间的诉讼一体化是违反民事程序的,不能进行,应分别进行审查。”根据这样的法理,Judex Jurist被授权宣布,违法与违约索赔之间的一体化诉讼是不可接受的诉讼(NO/niet oontvankelijk verklaard)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信