Following the White Rabbit: Integrity Verification Based on Risk Analysis Results

Christine Jakobs, Matthias Werner, Karsten Schmidt, Gerhard Hansch
{"title":"Following the White Rabbit: Integrity Verification Based on Risk Analysis Results","authors":"Christine Jakobs, Matthias Werner, Karsten Schmidt, Gerhard Hansch","doi":"10.1145/3488904.3493377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security is a cross-cutting issue in the automotive development process. The nature of cross-cutting issues demands constant coordination between different stakeholders. Changes in the vehicle functionalities lead to reoccurring security analysis steps, rising the complexity of progress tracking. While those process steps are typically done on function level, the vehicle architecture has to be verified as a composite, too. This is mostly done late in the development process by testing. Thus, architectural mismatches between functionalities security demands are often revealed too late. Starting from the definition of integrity as a system property in the information flow, we present the link from the MoRA approach to the architectural modeling and analysis approach. Verifying the no command-up policy is transferred to the temporal logic TLA+ allowing an early and fast architecture verification.","PeriodicalId":332312,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488904.3493377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Security is a cross-cutting issue in the automotive development process. The nature of cross-cutting issues demands constant coordination between different stakeholders. Changes in the vehicle functionalities lead to reoccurring security analysis steps, rising the complexity of progress tracking. While those process steps are typically done on function level, the vehicle architecture has to be verified as a composite, too. This is mostly done late in the development process by testing. Thus, architectural mismatches between functionalities security demands are often revealed too late. Starting from the definition of integrity as a system property in the information flow, we present the link from the MoRA approach to the architectural modeling and analysis approach. Verifying the no command-up policy is transferred to the temporal logic TLA+ allowing an early and fast architecture verification.
跟随大白兔:基于风险分析结果的完整性验证
安全是汽车开发过程中的一个交叉问题。跨领域问题的性质要求不同利益相关者之间不断协调。车辆功能的变化导致重复出现安全分析步骤,增加了进度跟踪的复杂性。虽然这些流程步骤通常是在功能级别上完成的,但车辆架构也必须作为一个组合进行验证。这主要是在开发过程的后期通过测试完成的。因此,功能和安全需求之间的体系结构不匹配往往发现得太晚了。从完整性作为信息流中的系统属性的定义开始,我们提出了从MoRA方法到体系结构建模和分析方法的链接。验证无命令启动策略被转移到临时逻辑TLA+,从而允许早期和快速的体系结构验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信