Satisfaction with Family Status and Housework Participation in Modern China

M. Kan, Guangye He, Xiaogang Wu
{"title":"Satisfaction with Family Status and Housework Participation in Modern China","authors":"M. Kan, Guangye He, Xiaogang Wu","doi":"10.1108/S1530-353520210000016004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past studies on housework and marital studies seldom considered the possible endogeneity between these two factors. This chapter analyses data of the Women’s Status Survey 2010 to investigate the association between satisfaction with family status and housework participation in dual-earner married couples in China. The authors examine the association by ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models and structural equation models (SEM), taking into account of time constraints, economic resources and other demographic characteristics. Results suggest that both men and women are less satisfied with their family status if they share more housework than their partners, after controlling for household income, relative economic contribution, educational qualifications and other factors. Moreover, relative housework contribution is associated more consistently and significantly with satisfaction with family status than absolute housework time. In SEM, the authors include a correlated error term between housework time and satisfaction in the models to take endogeneity between these factors into account. For both urban men and women, relative contribution of housework, but not absolute time of housework, is still negatively associated with family status satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":217936,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1530-353520210000016004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Past studies on housework and marital studies seldom considered the possible endogeneity between these two factors. This chapter analyses data of the Women’s Status Survey 2010 to investigate the association between satisfaction with family status and housework participation in dual-earner married couples in China. The authors examine the association by ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models and structural equation models (SEM), taking into account of time constraints, economic resources and other demographic characteristics. Results suggest that both men and women are less satisfied with their family status if they share more housework than their partners, after controlling for household income, relative economic contribution, educational qualifications and other factors. Moreover, relative housework contribution is associated more consistently and significantly with satisfaction with family status than absolute housework time. In SEM, the authors include a correlated error term between housework time and satisfaction in the models to take endogeneity between these factors into account. For both urban men and women, relative contribution of housework, but not absolute time of housework, is still negatively associated with family status satisfaction.
近代中国家庭地位满意度与家务劳动参与
过去关于家务劳动和婚姻研究的研究很少考虑这两个因素之间可能的内生性。本章通过对2010年中国妇女地位调查数据的分析,探讨中国双职工家庭家庭地位满意度与家务劳动参与的关系。考虑到时间限制、经济资源和其他人口特征,作者通过普通最小二乘(OLS)回归模型和结构方程模型(SEM)检验了这种关联。研究结果表明,在控制了家庭收入、相对经济贡献、教育程度和其他因素后,如果男性和女性分担的家务比伴侣多,那么他们对自己的家庭地位的满意度都较低。此外,相对家务劳动贡献比绝对家务劳动时间与家庭地位满意度的关系更为一致和显著。在扫描电镜中,作者在模型中加入了家务劳动时间和满意度之间的相关误差项,以考虑这些因素之间的内生性。对于城市男性和女性来说,家务劳动的相对贡献与家庭地位满意度仍然呈负相关,但绝对家务劳动时间与家庭地位满意度仍然呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信