Alignment solutions on FBEOL layers using ASML scanners: AEPM: Advanced equipment processes and materials

Pavan Samudrala, Gregory Hart, Yen-Jen Chen, Lokesh Subramany, Haiyong Gao, N. Aung, W. Chung, B. Minghetti, R. Mali, Seva Khikhlovskyi, P. Heres
{"title":"Alignment solutions on FBEOL layers using ASML scanners: AEPM: Advanced equipment processes and materials","authors":"Pavan Samudrala, Gregory Hart, Yen-Jen Chen, Lokesh Subramany, Haiyong Gao, N. Aung, W. Chung, B. Minghetti, R. Mali, Seva Khikhlovskyi, P. Heres","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.2018.8373194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wafers at FBEOL layers traditionally have higher stress and larger alignment signal variability. ASML's ATHENA sensor based scanners, commonly used to expose FBEOL layers, have large spot size (∼700um). Hence ATHENA captures the signal from larger area compared to the alignment marks which are typically ∼40um wide. This results in higher noise in the alignment signal and if the surrounding areas contain periodic product structures, they interfere with the alignment signal causing either alignment rejects or in some cases-misalignment. SMASH alignment sensors with smaller spot size (∼40um) and two additional probe lasers have been used to improve alignment quality and hence reduce mark/wafer rejects. However, due to the process variability, alignment issues still persist. For example, the aluminum grain size, alignment mark trench deposition uniformity, alignment mark asymmetry and variation in stack thicknesses all contribute to the alignment signal variability even within a single wafer. Here, a solution using SMASH sensor that involves designing new alignment marks to ensure conformal coating is proposed. Also new techniques and controls during coarse wafer alignment (COWA) and fine wafer alignment (FIWA) including extra controls over wafer shape parameters, longer scan lengths on alignment marks and weighted light source between Far Infra-Red laser (FIR) and Near Infra-Red (NIR) for alignment are presented. All the above mentioned techniques, when implemented, have reduced the wafer alignment reject rate from around 36% to less than 0.1%. Future work includes mark validation based on the signal response from the various laser colors. Finally, process monitoring using alignment parameters is explored.","PeriodicalId":349004,"journal":{"name":"2018 29th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 29th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.2018.8373194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wafers at FBEOL layers traditionally have higher stress and larger alignment signal variability. ASML's ATHENA sensor based scanners, commonly used to expose FBEOL layers, have large spot size (∼700um). Hence ATHENA captures the signal from larger area compared to the alignment marks which are typically ∼40um wide. This results in higher noise in the alignment signal and if the surrounding areas contain periodic product structures, they interfere with the alignment signal causing either alignment rejects or in some cases-misalignment. SMASH alignment sensors with smaller spot size (∼40um) and two additional probe lasers have been used to improve alignment quality and hence reduce mark/wafer rejects. However, due to the process variability, alignment issues still persist. For example, the aluminum grain size, alignment mark trench deposition uniformity, alignment mark asymmetry and variation in stack thicknesses all contribute to the alignment signal variability even within a single wafer. Here, a solution using SMASH sensor that involves designing new alignment marks to ensure conformal coating is proposed. Also new techniques and controls during coarse wafer alignment (COWA) and fine wafer alignment (FIWA) including extra controls over wafer shape parameters, longer scan lengths on alignment marks and weighted light source between Far Infra-Red laser (FIR) and Near Infra-Red (NIR) for alignment are presented. All the above mentioned techniques, when implemented, have reduced the wafer alignment reject rate from around 36% to less than 0.1%. Future work includes mark validation based on the signal response from the various laser colors. Finally, process monitoring using alignment parameters is explored.
使用ASML扫描仪的FBEOL层对准解决方案:AEPM:先进的设备工艺和材料
传统上,FBEOL层的晶圆具有更高的应力和更大的对准信号可变性。ASML基于ATHENA传感器的扫描仪,通常用于暴露FBEOL层,具有较大的光斑尺寸(约700um)。因此,与通常为~ 40um宽的对准标记相比,ATHENA捕获的信号来自更大的区域。这导致对准信号中的高噪声,如果周围区域包含周期性产品结构,它们会干扰对准信号,导致对准拒绝或在某些情况下-不对准。SMASH对准传感器具有较小的光斑尺寸(~ 40um)和两个额外的探头激光器,用于提高对准质量,从而减少标记/晶圆废品率。然而,由于过程的可变性,校准问题仍然存在。例如,铝晶粒尺寸、对中标记沟槽沉积均匀性、对中标记不对称性和堆叠厚度的变化都会导致单晶圆内对中信号的变化。本文提出了一种使用SMASH传感器的解决方案,该解决方案涉及设计新的对准标记以确保涂层的保形。此外,还介绍了在粗晶圆对准(COWA)和精细晶圆对准(FIWA)过程中的新技术和控制方法,包括对晶圆形状参数的额外控制、对对准标记的更长的扫描长度以及在远红外激光(FIR)和近红外(NIR)之间进行对准的加权光源。上述所有技术在实施后,将晶圆对准废品率从36%左右降低到0.1%以下。未来的工作包括基于各种激光颜色的信号响应的标记验证。最后,探讨了利用对准参数进行过程监控的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信