Evaluating MaSE Methodology in the Requirements Identification

R.C.S. Sousa, A.L.F. da Cunha, R.F.A. Martins, Vera Werneck, L. M. Cysneiros
{"title":"Evaluating MaSE Methodology in the Requirements Identification","authors":"R.C.S. Sousa, A.L.F. da Cunha, R.F.A. Martins, Vera Werneck, L. M. Cysneiros","doi":"10.1109/SEW.2009.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agent orientation appears as a solution for constructing complex systems adapting the requirements identification to cope with agent properties like autonomy, sociability and pro-activeness. Many methodologies were proposed adopting this new paradigm. However, most of them are still in development and therefore need to be adapted. In this work MaSE, an agent-oriented methodology is evaluated. We use an exemplar proposed in 2001 by Yu and Cysneiros [1] to evaluate both agent/goal orientation and object orientation. This evaluation aims at analysing which are the strengths and weaknesses of MaSE through the methodologies questions proposed in the exemplar.","PeriodicalId":252007,"journal":{"name":"2009 33rd Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 33rd Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2009.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Agent orientation appears as a solution for constructing complex systems adapting the requirements identification to cope with agent properties like autonomy, sociability and pro-activeness. Many methodologies were proposed adopting this new paradigm. However, most of them are still in development and therefore need to be adapted. In this work MaSE, an agent-oriented methodology is evaluated. We use an exemplar proposed in 2001 by Yu and Cysneiros [1] to evaluate both agent/goal orientation and object orientation. This evaluation aims at analysing which are the strengths and weaknesses of MaSE through the methodologies questions proposed in the exemplar.
评估需求识别中的MaSE方法
面向智能体是构建复杂系统的一种解决方案,它适应需求识别来处理智能体的自主性、社会性和主动性等特性。采用这种新范式提出了许多方法。然而,其中大多数仍处于开发阶段,因此需要进行调整。在这项工作中,MaSE,一个面向主体的方法进行了评估。我们使用Yu和Cysneiros[1]在2001年提出的一个范例来评估智能体/目标取向和对象取向。本评估旨在通过范例中提出的方法问题分析MaSE的优势和劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信