To Cost an Elephant: An Exploratory Survey on Cost Estimating Practice in the Light of Product-Service-Systems

E. Settanni, N. E. Thenent, L. Newnes, G. Parry, Y. Goh
{"title":"To Cost an Elephant: An Exploratory Survey on Cost Estimating Practice in the Light of Product-Service-Systems","authors":"E. Settanni, N. E. Thenent, L. Newnes, G. Parry, Y. Goh","doi":"10.1080/1941658X.2015.1016588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Businesses now contracting for availability are regarded as part of a paradigm shift away from the familiar ‘product and support’ business model. The main difference being that such businesses eventually commit to provide a service outcome via product-service-system. The research presented in this article investigates how current cost estimating practice relates with the idea of having as the point of focus for the analysis a product-service-system delivering service outcomes, rather than a product. Since the topic is in its infancy, an exploratory survey was designed and circulated via the Internet among practitioners with the aim of looking for initial patterns, ideas, and hypotheses, rather than to confirm existing ones. The picture that seems to emerge is that respondents would not necessarily see the representation and modeling of a product-service-system as being a precondition to estimate the cost of the service it provides. In line with most academic literature, respondents would rather consider the cost of providing a service via product-service-system as conceptually equivalent to the cost of the in-service stage of a durable product. Although not allowing for generalization, this research reveals paths that may be worth exploring further.","PeriodicalId":390877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1941658X.2015.1016588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Businesses now contracting for availability are regarded as part of a paradigm shift away from the familiar ‘product and support’ business model. The main difference being that such businesses eventually commit to provide a service outcome via product-service-system. The research presented in this article investigates how current cost estimating practice relates with the idea of having as the point of focus for the analysis a product-service-system delivering service outcomes, rather than a product. Since the topic is in its infancy, an exploratory survey was designed and circulated via the Internet among practitioners with the aim of looking for initial patterns, ideas, and hypotheses, rather than to confirm existing ones. The picture that seems to emerge is that respondents would not necessarily see the representation and modeling of a product-service-system as being a precondition to estimate the cost of the service it provides. In line with most academic literature, respondents would rather consider the cost of providing a service via product-service-system as conceptually equivalent to the cost of the in-service stage of a durable product. Although not allowing for generalization, this research reveals paths that may be worth exploring further.
象的成本:基于产品-服务系统的成本估算实践的探索性调查
现在的业务合同的可用性被认为是范式转变的一部分,从熟悉的“产品和支持”的业务模式。主要区别在于,这些企业最终承诺通过产品-服务系统提供服务结果。本文中提出的研究调查了当前的成本估算实践是如何与将交付服务结果的产品-服务系统(而不是产品)作为分析焦点的想法联系起来的。由于该主题尚处于起步阶段,因此设计了一项探索性调查,并通过互联网在从业者中传播,目的是寻找初始模式、想法和假设,而不是确认现有的模式、想法和假设。似乎出现的情况是,受访者不一定会将产品-服务系统的表示和建模视为估计其提供的服务成本的先决条件。与大多数学术文献一致,受访者宁愿认为通过产品-服务系统提供服务的成本在概念上等同于耐用产品在使用阶段的成本。虽然不能一概而论,但这项研究揭示了值得进一步探索的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信