816 Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a German survey on patient care and clinical trials in gynecological oncology (MONITOR-17 Survey)

S. Nasser, D. Zocholl, S. Boz, M. Keller, D. Dimitrova, R. Armbrust, Ju Blohmer, C. Fotopoulou, A. Dubois, MG Inci, J. Sehouli
{"title":"816 Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a German survey on patient care and clinical trials in gynecological oncology (MONITOR-17 Survey)","authors":"S. Nasser, D. Zocholl, S. Boz, M. Keller, D. Dimitrova, R. Armbrust, Ju Blohmer, C. Fotopoulou, A. Dubois, MG Inci, J. Sehouli","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Background*This survey describes the German-wide impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on provision of clinical care and recruitment in clinical trials of patients with gynecologic malignancies from a physician’s perspective.MethodologyWe performed an online anonymous multicentric prospective survey across clinicians in Germany. The multiple-choice questionnaire was administered at 4-6 weekly intervals from April 2020 to October 2020 for a total of four series.Result(s)*483 questionnaires were completed. The majority of participants were gynecological oncologists (83.3%) in certified gynecologic cancer centers (61%) and breast cancer (BC) centers (80.4%). The majority stated a 50% reduction in surgical interventions for gyne-oncological cases. Cases that were prioritized for surgery across all tumors were those with early stage disease, at primary situation and with a good ECOG status. For BC, patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment and those with high-risk or locally-advanced BC were prioritized. The majority (73%) continued to conduct clinical trials throughout the pandemic. In cases were trials were discontinued, this decision was made by sponsors, and hospital officers. Other reasons for discontinuation included lack of patient-participation (due to fear of attending appointments). Almost 100% of the responders refuted any increased tendency to treat with a neoadjuvant approach (cytotoxic, hormonal, radiation) patients that would qualify for surgery under normal circumstances . This comes in direct contrast to the increased attitude to treat with neoadjuvant anticancer therapy of advanced cancers in other European countries.Only 18% of the clinicians reported feeling adequately informed about established safety pathways for COVID-19 positive patients with gynecological cancers. More than 43% of the clinicians felt that the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to impact on clinical care for up to 2 years.Conclusion*Targeted emergency algorithms for patients with gynecological cancers need to be developed to protect and preserve care and treatment options for our patients in future pandemics.","PeriodicalId":253349,"journal":{"name":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Background*This survey describes the German-wide impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on provision of clinical care and recruitment in clinical trials of patients with gynecologic malignancies from a physician’s perspective.MethodologyWe performed an online anonymous multicentric prospective survey across clinicians in Germany. The multiple-choice questionnaire was administered at 4-6 weekly intervals from April 2020 to October 2020 for a total of four series.Result(s)*483 questionnaires were completed. The majority of participants were gynecological oncologists (83.3%) in certified gynecologic cancer centers (61%) and breast cancer (BC) centers (80.4%). The majority stated a 50% reduction in surgical interventions for gyne-oncological cases. Cases that were prioritized for surgery across all tumors were those with early stage disease, at primary situation and with a good ECOG status. For BC, patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment and those with high-risk or locally-advanced BC were prioritized. The majority (73%) continued to conduct clinical trials throughout the pandemic. In cases were trials were discontinued, this decision was made by sponsors, and hospital officers. Other reasons for discontinuation included lack of patient-participation (due to fear of attending appointments). Almost 100% of the responders refuted any increased tendency to treat with a neoadjuvant approach (cytotoxic, hormonal, radiation) patients that would qualify for surgery under normal circumstances . This comes in direct contrast to the increased attitude to treat with neoadjuvant anticancer therapy of advanced cancers in other European countries.Only 18% of the clinicians reported feeling adequately informed about established safety pathways for COVID-19 positive patients with gynecological cancers. More than 43% of the clinicians felt that the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to impact on clinical care for up to 2 years.Conclusion*Targeted emergency algorithms for patients with gynecological cancers need to be developed to protect and preserve care and treatment options for our patients in future pandemics.
2019冠状病毒病大流行的影响:德国妇科肿瘤患者护理和临床试验调查结果(MONITOR-17调查)
*本调查从医生的角度描述了COVID-19大流行对德国范围内提供临床护理和招募妇科恶性肿瘤患者临床试验的影响。方法:我们对德国临床医生进行了一项在线匿名多中心前瞻性调查。多项选择问卷于2020年4月至2020年10月每4-6周进行一次,共4个系列,共完成问卷483份。大多数参与者是经认证的妇科癌症中心(61%)和乳腺癌(BC)中心(80.4%)的妇科肿瘤学家(83.3%)。大多数人表示妇科肿瘤病例的手术干预减少了50%。在所有肿瘤中,优先进行手术的病例是那些早期疾病,原发情况和ECOG状态良好的病例。对于BC,接受新辅助化疗的患者和高危或局部晚期BC患者优先考虑。大多数(73%)在大流行期间继续进行临床试验。在终止试验的情况下,这一决定是由赞助者和医院官员作出的。其他停止治疗的原因包括缺乏患者参与(由于害怕赴约)。几乎100%的应答者驳斥了任何新辅助方法(细胞毒性,激素,放射)治疗的增加趋势,这些患者在正常情况下符合手术条件。这与其他欧洲国家对晚期癌症的新辅助抗癌治疗态度的增加形成了直接对比。只有18%的临床医生报告说,他们对COVID-19阳性妇科癌症患者的既定安全途径有充分的了解。超过43%的临床医生认为,COVID-19大流行将继续影响临床护理长达2年。*需要开发针对妇科癌症患者的有针对性的紧急算法,以便在未来的大流行中保护和保留患者的护理和治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信