Ativismo judicial e movimento migratório indígena: a tutela judicial na implementação de centros indígenas de ocupação itinerante a partir da teoria dos direitos fundamentais de Robert Alexy

Ricardo Aparecido de Souto, Rogério Cangussu Dantas Cachichi
{"title":"Ativismo judicial e movimento migratório indígena: a tutela judicial na implementação de centros indígenas de ocupação itinerante a partir da teoria dos direitos fundamentais de Robert Alexy","authors":"Ricardo Aparecido de Souto, Rogério Cangussu Dantas Cachichi","doi":"10.33636/RECONTO.V2N1.E018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text brings to light the problem of judicial activism in matters of indigenous public policy. The central issue is the (in) admission of judicial protection that determines to the public manager to construct and maintain centers of itinerant occupation (houses of passage), with minimum structure of operation (water, light, rooms, bathroom, kitchen, to attend to the Indians who travel through the cities in migratory movement proper to their ethnic group. The purpose of the text is not to provide a definitive or a unique answer. The purpose is to suggest some more or less definite path through which it might be appropriate to address the problem. The rationale for this research stems from the importance of issues ranging from the protection of the Indian, indigenous culture and traditions to the limits and parameters of the Judiciary in the State of Democratic Law, especially when it acts in the field of public policies, judicializing options usually related to the public manager. Based on a bibliographic procedure, with a qualitative approach, the text concludes with some reasons why the concrete circumstances experienced in an eventual conflict submitted to the Judiciary may have great methodological and argumentative relevance to unveil the issues covered in the article.","PeriodicalId":272385,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Constitucionalização do Direito Brasileiro","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Constitucionalização do Direito Brasileiro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33636/RECONTO.V2N1.E018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The text brings to light the problem of judicial activism in matters of indigenous public policy. The central issue is the (in) admission of judicial protection that determines to the public manager to construct and maintain centers of itinerant occupation (houses of passage), with minimum structure of operation (water, light, rooms, bathroom, kitchen, to attend to the Indians who travel through the cities in migratory movement proper to their ethnic group. The purpose of the text is not to provide a definitive or a unique answer. The purpose is to suggest some more or less definite path through which it might be appropriate to address the problem. The rationale for this research stems from the importance of issues ranging from the protection of the Indian, indigenous culture and traditions to the limits and parameters of the Judiciary in the State of Democratic Law, especially when it acts in the field of public policies, judicializing options usually related to the public manager. Based on a bibliographic procedure, with a qualitative approach, the text concludes with some reasons why the concrete circumstances experienced in an eventual conflict submitted to the Judiciary may have great methodological and argumentative relevance to unveil the issues covered in the article.
司法能动主义与土著移民运动:罗伯特·阿列克谢基本权利理论对土著流动职业中心实施的司法保护
该文本揭示了土著公共政策事务中司法能动主义的问题。核心问题是司法保护的承认,这决定了公共管理者建立和维护流动职业中心(通行房屋),以最低限度的运作结构(水,光,房间,浴室,厨房)来照顾那些在城市中迁徙的印第安人,这些印第安人适合他们的种族群体。本文的目的不是提供一个确定的或唯一的答案。其目的是建议一些或多或少明确的途径,通过这些途径可能是解决问题的适当途径。这项研究的理由是,从保护印第安人、土著文化和传统到民主法律国家司法机构的限制和参数等问题的重要性,特别是当它在公共政策领域采取行动时,将通常与公共管理人员有关的选择司法化。根据书目程序,采用定性方法,本文最后提出了一些理由,说明为什么提交司法机构的在最终冲突中所经历的具体情况可能对揭示该条所涵盖的问题具有很大的方法和论证意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信