Evaluation of Wind Effects on Buildings Using Design Codes and Numerical Wind Tunnel Tests

I. Hossain, M. Islam, A. Amin
{"title":"Evaluation of Wind Effects on Buildings Using Design Codes and Numerical Wind Tunnel Tests","authors":"I. Hossain, M. Islam, A. Amin","doi":"10.30540/sae-2023-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The evaluation of wind effect on the regular shape and simple diaphragm buildings and structures due to wind load has been calculated by several international codes and standards where wind gust nature and dynamic effect could not capture. Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC) provides the tools for engineers to calculate the wind pressures for the design of a regular-shaped structure with a height to width ratio of less than 5.0, a simple diaphragm, and no unusual geometrical irregularity. If these conditions do not satisfy a wind tunnel testing is required. In this study, a comparative study between two codes in Bangladesh (BNBC-2006 and BNBC-2020), and wind tunnel test results are conducted. An investigation is carried out on four typical buildings with variable heights located within Dhaka, Bangladesh. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program RWIND is used to calculate the wind loads on buildings and are compared with those obtained by Bangladesh National Building Codes. Storey shear of four different building models is compared. Between BNBC-2006 and BNBC-2020, there is up to a 53% difference in storey shear. Whereas, up to 30% variation in storey shear is observed between the numerical wind tunnel test data and the data calculated using the BNBC-2020 equations. Finally, this study will help in improving BNBC code provisions for wind load calculations.","PeriodicalId":109008,"journal":{"name":"Structure and Environment","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30540/sae-2023-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The evaluation of wind effect on the regular shape and simple diaphragm buildings and structures due to wind load has been calculated by several international codes and standards where wind gust nature and dynamic effect could not capture. Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC) provides the tools for engineers to calculate the wind pressures for the design of a regular-shaped structure with a height to width ratio of less than 5.0, a simple diaphragm, and no unusual geometrical irregularity. If these conditions do not satisfy a wind tunnel testing is required. In this study, a comparative study between two codes in Bangladesh (BNBC-2006 and BNBC-2020), and wind tunnel test results are conducted. An investigation is carried out on four typical buildings with variable heights located within Dhaka, Bangladesh. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program RWIND is used to calculate the wind loads on buildings and are compared with those obtained by Bangladesh National Building Codes. Storey shear of four different building models is compared. Between BNBC-2006 and BNBC-2020, there is up to a 53% difference in storey shear. Whereas, up to 30% variation in storey shear is observed between the numerical wind tunnel test data and the data calculated using the BNBC-2020 equations. Finally, this study will help in improving BNBC code provisions for wind load calculations.
用设计规范和数值风洞试验评价风对建筑物的影响
摘要:规则形状和简单的隔振结构在风荷载作用下的风效应评价采用了几种国际规范和标准进行计算,但不能反映阵风性质和动力效应。孟加拉国国家建筑规范(BNBC)为工程师提供了计算风压的工具,用于设计高宽比小于5.0的规则形状结构,简单的隔膜,没有异常的几何不规则。如果这些条件不满足,就需要进行风洞试验。本研究对孟加拉国两个规范(BNBC-2006和BNBC-2020)进行了对比研究,并进行了风洞试验结果。对位于孟加拉国达卡的四座典型的可变高度建筑进行了调查。采用计算流体力学(CFD)程序RWIND计算了建筑物的风荷载,并与孟加拉国国家建筑规范的计算结果进行了比较。比较了四种不同建筑模型的剪力。在BNBC-2006和BNBC-2020之间,层间剪力差高达53%。然而,在数值风洞试验数据和使用BNBC-2020方程计算的数据之间,观察到高达30%的层间剪切变化。最后,本研究将有助于改进BNBC规范对风荷载计算的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信