Comparative Study between Cardiac Monitor & Mercury Sphygmomanometer in Efficiency & Accuracy of Reading at El-mek-Nimer Hospital University-Shendi University-2020

Amna Omer Abdalrhman Alrayah, Mohammed Ibrahim Osman Ahmed, Fiza Ahmed Saaed Mosa, Safa Babiker, Mohammed Jebreldar Abuanja Nimer
{"title":"Comparative Study between Cardiac Monitor & Mercury Sphygmomanometer in Efficiency & Accuracy of Reading at El-mek-Nimer Hospital University-Shendi University-2020","authors":"Amna Omer Abdalrhman Alrayah, Mohammed Ibrahim Osman Ahmed, Fiza Ahmed Saaed Mosa, Safa Babiker, Mohammed Jebreldar Abuanja Nimer","doi":"10.36349/easjnm.2022.v04i03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recording blood pressure is important part of long term epidemiological study which has confirmed the importance of high blood pressure as risk factor in cardiovascular disease the Objectives of this study was to evaluate difference of reading of blood pressure between cardiac monitor And mercury sphygmomanometer from arm site. Method: This was analytical comparative study was conducted in the Sudan, river Nile state, Shendi town, in the Elmek Nimer two devices (mercury, cardiac monitor)&stethoscope were used to measure blood pressure From the upper arm, the data was analyzed by using statistical package of social science (SPSS version 22). Results and Conclusion: The study showed that, cardiac monitor more accurate in measuring blood pressure rather than mercury sphygmomanometer. Recommendation: The study was recommended that: All health team members should be used cardiac monitor rather than mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure, so that they have to recheck reading of mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure before it used.","PeriodicalId":131219,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjnm.2022.v04i03.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recording blood pressure is important part of long term epidemiological study which has confirmed the importance of high blood pressure as risk factor in cardiovascular disease the Objectives of this study was to evaluate difference of reading of blood pressure between cardiac monitor And mercury sphygmomanometer from arm site. Method: This was analytical comparative study was conducted in the Sudan, river Nile state, Shendi town, in the Elmek Nimer two devices (mercury, cardiac monitor)&stethoscope were used to measure blood pressure From the upper arm, the data was analyzed by using statistical package of social science (SPSS version 22). Results and Conclusion: The study showed that, cardiac monitor more accurate in measuring blood pressure rather than mercury sphygmomanometer. Recommendation: The study was recommended that: All health team members should be used cardiac monitor rather than mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure, so that they have to recheck reading of mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure before it used.
心脏监护仪与水银血压计读数效率和准确性的比较研究
背景:记录血压是长期流行病学研究的重要组成部分,证实了高血压作为心血管疾病危险因素的重要性。本研究的目的是评价心脏监护仪和臂部汞柱血压计读数的血压差异。方法:采用分析性比较研究方法,在苏丹尼罗州的申地镇,在Elmek Nimer用两种仪器(汞柱、心电监护仪)和听诊器测量上臂血压,数据采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS version 22)进行分析。结果与结论:心脏监护仪比水银血压计测量血压更准确。建议:该研究建议:所有卫生团队成员应使用心脏监测仪而不是水银血压计血压,以便他们在使用水银血压计血压之前必须重新检查读数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信