Methodologies for the design of application frameworks: systematic review

M. Ramírez, Miguel De-la-Torre, Carlos Monsalve
{"title":"Methodologies for the design of application frameworks: systematic review","authors":"M. Ramírez, Miguel De-la-Torre, Carlos Monsalve","doi":"10.1109/CIMPS49236.2019.9082427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Framework design for application development allows to reuse design patterns and code, speeding up the production of software in a same domain. However, in order to design a framework, it is required a considerable time before a functional product is ready to use, and it is essential to design following the best practices. The lack of a guide with current methodologies for framework development was the main motivation to pursue this systematic review. In this paper, the results of the systematic review to find the methodologies for framework development in the context of software engineering are reported and analyzed. The initial search threw 13,624 documents, from which only 30 references were relevant after refinement. The analysis of these documents provided evidence of diverse methodologies for framework development, which adopt UML for their definition. On the other hand, whereas some works emphasize the structure to support the functionality, others prioritize the behavior of the classes. The analysis of the results suggests the use of UML in the design process, the implementation of design patterns, the identification of hot-spots, and the recognition of black-box and white-box frameworks.","PeriodicalId":409506,"journal":{"name":"2019 8th International Conference On Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 8th International Conference On Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMPS49236.2019.9082427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Framework design for application development allows to reuse design patterns and code, speeding up the production of software in a same domain. However, in order to design a framework, it is required a considerable time before a functional product is ready to use, and it is essential to design following the best practices. The lack of a guide with current methodologies for framework development was the main motivation to pursue this systematic review. In this paper, the results of the systematic review to find the methodologies for framework development in the context of software engineering are reported and analyzed. The initial search threw 13,624 documents, from which only 30 references were relevant after refinement. The analysis of these documents provided evidence of diverse methodologies for framework development, which adopt UML for their definition. On the other hand, whereas some works emphasize the structure to support the functionality, others prioritize the behavior of the classes. The analysis of the results suggests the use of UML in the design process, the implementation of design patterns, the identification of hot-spots, and the recognition of black-box and white-box frameworks.
设计应用程序框架的方法:系统审查
应用程序开发的框架设计允许重用设计模式和代码,从而加快同一领域的软件生产。然而,为了设计一个框架,在功能产品准备好使用之前需要相当长的时间,并且必须遵循最佳实践进行设计。缺乏当前框架开发方法的指南是进行这种系统审查的主要动机。在本文中,报告和分析了在软件工程背景下寻找框架开发方法的系统回顾的结果。最初的搜索产生了13,624个文档,经过优化后,只有30个参考文献是相关的。对这些文档的分析为框架开发提供了多种方法的证据,这些方法采用UML作为其定义。另一方面,虽然有些作品强调结构以支持功能,但其他作品则优先考虑类的行为。对结果的分析建议在设计过程中使用UML,实现设计模式,识别热点,以及识别黑盒和白盒框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信