“Efficiency of the Buikstra & Ubelaker and Ferembach Methods, In the Estimation of Sex in Human Skulls from the Department of Ayacucho, Peru”

Leslie Arriarán Juscamaita
{"title":"“Efficiency of the Buikstra & Ubelaker and Ferembach Methods, In the Estimation of Sex in Human Skulls from the Department of Ayacucho, Peru”","authors":"Leslie Arriarán Juscamaita","doi":"10.23880/ijfsc-16000311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The estimation of sex in human skulls has been a very controversial issue over the years, due to the interpopulation sexual dimorphism that exists. For this reason, we have decided to carry out the following work, in which we will apply and discuss two qualitative methodologies in a sample of 84 adult skulls (male and female), from the Forensic Investigations Laboratory of the Department of Ayacucho - Peru in order to study the effectiveness of these methodologies. Each methodology will have numerical indicators that will represent the degree of sexual dysmorphism, in certain areas that vary differently according to the methodology. In the Buikstra & Ubelaker method we will assign degrees in 5 zones inside the skull; while in the Ferembach method we will evaluate 17 areas between the skull and the jaw that will be detailed later. When obtaining the results of both methodologies, it was observed that there is a significant difference between both methods, being the qualitative method Buikstra & Ubelaker with more successes, thus concluding its greater effectiveness in estimating sex in human skulls.","PeriodicalId":231200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forensic Sciences","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forensic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ijfsc-16000311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The estimation of sex in human skulls has been a very controversial issue over the years, due to the interpopulation sexual dimorphism that exists. For this reason, we have decided to carry out the following work, in which we will apply and discuss two qualitative methodologies in a sample of 84 adult skulls (male and female), from the Forensic Investigations Laboratory of the Department of Ayacucho - Peru in order to study the effectiveness of these methodologies. Each methodology will have numerical indicators that will represent the degree of sexual dysmorphism, in certain areas that vary differently according to the methodology. In the Buikstra & Ubelaker method we will assign degrees in 5 zones inside the skull; while in the Ferembach method we will evaluate 17 areas between the skull and the jaw that will be detailed later. When obtaining the results of both methodologies, it was observed that there is a significant difference between both methods, being the qualitative method Buikstra & Ubelaker with more successes, thus concluding its greater effectiveness in estimating sex in human skulls.
Buikstra & Ubelaker和Ferembach方法在秘鲁阿亚库乔地区人类头骨性别估计中的有效性
多年来,由于种群间性别二态性的存在,对人类头骨性别的估计一直是一个非常有争议的问题。为此,我们决定开展以下工作,我们将在秘鲁阿亚库乔省法医调查实验室的84个成人头骨样本(男性和女性)中应用和讨论两种定性方法,以研究这些方法的有效性。每一种方法都将有数字指标,这些指标将代表性别畸形的程度,在某些领域,根据方法的不同而有所不同。在Buikstra & Ubelaker方法中,我们将在颅骨内的5个区域分配度;而在Ferembach方法中,我们将评估颅骨和颌骨之间的17个区域,稍后将详细介绍。当获得这两种方法的结果时,观察到两种方法之间存在显着差异,定性方法Buikstra & Ubelaker更成功,从而得出其在估计人类头骨性别方面更有效的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信