THE STUDY OF THE THEORETICAL ISSUES OF IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIAL COMMERCE: LEGAL OPINION ON THE RISKS FOR THE CONSUMER

K. Belikova
{"title":"THE STUDY OF THE THEORETICAL ISSUES OF IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIAL COMMERCE: LEGAL OPINION ON THE RISKS FOR THE CONSUMER","authors":"K. Belikova","doi":"10.33693/2072-3164-2020-13-6-38-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the theoretical issues of implementing of social commerce through the prism of legal risk assessment of consumers involved, where social commerce is understood as electronic sales (e-commerce) using social networks to support social interactions and user participation on the principle of “words spread from mouth to mouth”. Among these risks the author points out the problem of obtaining complete and reliable objective (neutral) information from various sources (bloggers, influencers, etc.), which causes concerns similar to those that arise in connection with the functioning and application of smart contracts in the blockchain, and the danger of concluding contracts that have traditionally been qualified by many legal systems as “contracts concluded on the go” (impulse buying) in the light of the idea that social commerce is positioned as being aimed at instant gratification of the user's needs, desires, and interests that have arisen during the use of the social network. Legal and other ways to overcome these risks are considered (for example, the possibilities of a new subscription economy, etc. Scientific novelty is determined by the goal of the article itself and the range of issues under consideration. The conclusions reached by the author are, in particular, that it is established that if the requirements for advertising placed online relate to its completeness, reliability and objectivity, fix measures of responsibility for advertisers, then the rules for conducting online trading and commerce include simultaneously with such provisions prohibitions of unfair practices and misleading advertising, as well as criteria for their qualification, etc.","PeriodicalId":446864,"journal":{"name":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","volume":"3686 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2020-13-6-38-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the theoretical issues of implementing of social commerce through the prism of legal risk assessment of consumers involved, where social commerce is understood as electronic sales (e-commerce) using social networks to support social interactions and user participation on the principle of “words spread from mouth to mouth”. Among these risks the author points out the problem of obtaining complete and reliable objective (neutral) information from various sources (bloggers, influencers, etc.), which causes concerns similar to those that arise in connection with the functioning and application of smart contracts in the blockchain, and the danger of concluding contracts that have traditionally been qualified by many legal systems as “contracts concluded on the go” (impulse buying) in the light of the idea that social commerce is positioned as being aimed at instant gratification of the user's needs, desires, and interests that have arisen during the use of the social network. Legal and other ways to overcome these risks are considered (for example, the possibilities of a new subscription economy, etc. Scientific novelty is determined by the goal of the article itself and the range of issues under consideration. The conclusions reached by the author are, in particular, that it is established that if the requirements for advertising placed online relate to its completeness, reliability and objectivity, fix measures of responsibility for advertisers, then the rules for conducting online trading and commerce include simultaneously with such provisions prohibitions of unfair practices and misleading advertising, as well as criteria for their qualification, etc.
社会电子商务实施的理论问题研究:消费者风险的法律意见
本文通过对所涉及的消费者进行法律风险评估的棱镜来考察实施社交商务的理论问题,其中社交商务被理解为利用社交网络支持社交互动和用户参与的电子销售(电子商务),其原则是“口口相传”。在这些风险中,提交人指出了从各种来源(博主、影响者等)获取完整可靠的客观(中立)信息的问题,这引起了与bbb中智能合约的功能和应用相关的担忧。在社交商务被定位为旨在即时满足用户在使用社交网络过程中产生的需求、欲望和兴趣的想法的背景下,签订合同的危险通常被许多法律体系限定为“在移动中签订的合同”(冲动购买)。考虑了克服这些风险的法律和其他方法(例如,新的订阅经济的可能性等)。科学的新颖性是由文章本身的目标和所考虑问题的范围决定的。笔者特别得出的结论是,如果对网络广告的要求涉及广告的完整性、可靠性和客观性,确定了广告商的责任措施,那么进行网络交易和商业的规则在规定这些规定的同时,还包括禁止不公平做法和误导性广告,以及他们的资格标准等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信