Privacy Is Dead, Long Live Privacy!: Two Diverging Perspectives on Current Issues Related to Privacy

T. Dienlin, Johannes Breuer
{"title":"Privacy Is Dead, Long Live Privacy!: Two Diverging Perspectives on Current Issues Related to Privacy","authors":"T. Dienlin, Johannes Breuer","doi":"10.1027/1864-1105/a000357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Privacy is a hotly debated topic in academia and society. The digitalization of our world has had enormous implications for our privacy. Some researchers and public figures agree that privacy has changed substantially, that we are living in a post-privacy world, and that we need to address privacy differently. Conversely, others maintain that privacy remains a relevant concept in our society, and that, although facets and degrees of privacy change, the conceptual core and societal relevance remain unchanged and intact. In this paper, we discuss the current state and future of privacy, presenting two opposing stances on four central questions: Has privacy changed? Is privacy dead? Have we lost control over our own privacy? How should we react? With this dialogue we hope to provide an overview of current positions on privacy by presenting divergent lines of reasoning and thinking, while outlining potential paths forward.","PeriodicalId":366104,"journal":{"name":"J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Privacy is a hotly debated topic in academia and society. The digitalization of our world has had enormous implications for our privacy. Some researchers and public figures agree that privacy has changed substantially, that we are living in a post-privacy world, and that we need to address privacy differently. Conversely, others maintain that privacy remains a relevant concept in our society, and that, although facets and degrees of privacy change, the conceptual core and societal relevance remain unchanged and intact. In this paper, we discuss the current state and future of privacy, presenting two opposing stances on four central questions: Has privacy changed? Is privacy dead? Have we lost control over our own privacy? How should we react? With this dialogue we hope to provide an overview of current positions on privacy by presenting divergent lines of reasoning and thinking, while outlining potential paths forward.
隐私已死,隐私万岁!当前有关隐私问题的两种不同观点
摘要隐私在学术界和社会上都是一个争论激烈的话题。世界的数字化对我们的隐私产生了巨大的影响。一些研究人员和公众人物一致认为,隐私已经发生了实质性的变化,我们生活在一个后隐私时代,我们需要以不同的方式处理隐私问题。相反,其他人则认为隐私在我们的社会中仍然是一个相关的概念,尽管隐私的方面和程度发生了变化,但概念核心和社会相关性保持不变。在本文中,我们讨论了隐私的现状和未来,在四个核心问题上提出了两种对立的立场:隐私改变了吗?隐私死了吗?我们是否已经失去了对自己隐私的控制?我们该如何应对?通过这次对话,我们希望通过提出不同的推理和思考路线,概述当前在隐私问题上的立场,同时概述潜在的前进道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信