PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA PESERTA DIDIK KELAS XI MIPA

Afni Karmilawati, Aidhia Rahmi
{"title":"PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA PESERTA DIDIK KELAS XI MIPA","authors":"Afni Karmilawati, Aidhia Rahmi","doi":"10.22202/JRFES.2019.V6I1.3464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The background of this research  not all students like physics learning. This is caused by students' lack of understanding of physics learning material. The students' incomprehension can be seen when the learning process takes place, some students are embarrassed to ask even though basically the students do not understand the material presented by the teacher in front of the class. This type of research is Quasi Experiment with research design in the form of Design Group Control. Data on physics learning results are seen in two domains, namely the cognitive and affective domains. In the cognitive domain, the average experimental class has an average of 67.37 while the class has an average of 60.76. Learning outcomes in the affective domain obtained from the assessment of student activity sheets had an average of 79 in the experimental class and 74 in the control class. Based on the results of the analysis of hypothesis testing with the F test, it was found that t count = 1.64, and t table = 2.00, where if –t table < t count < t table then the hypothesis is rejected. So it can be concluded that the use of cooperative learning model type Group Investigation does not affect the learning outcomes of physics students of class XI MIPA SMAN 1 Enam Lingkung.","PeriodicalId":189667,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi dan Sains","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi dan Sains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22202/JRFES.2019.V6I1.3464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The background of this research  not all students like physics learning. This is caused by students' lack of understanding of physics learning material. The students' incomprehension can be seen when the learning process takes place, some students are embarrassed to ask even though basically the students do not understand the material presented by the teacher in front of the class. This type of research is Quasi Experiment with research design in the form of Design Group Control. Data on physics learning results are seen in two domains, namely the cognitive and affective domains. In the cognitive domain, the average experimental class has an average of 67.37 while the class has an average of 60.76. Learning outcomes in the affective domain obtained from the assessment of student activity sheets had an average of 79 in the experimental class and 74 in the control class. Based on the results of the analysis of hypothesis testing with the F test, it was found that t count = 1.64, and t table = 2.00, where if –t table < t count < t table then the hypothesis is rejected. So it can be concluded that the use of cooperative learning model type Group Investigation does not affect the learning outcomes of physics students of class XI MIPA SMAN 1 Enam Lingkung.
本研究的背景并不是所有的学生都喜欢物理学习。这是由于学生对物理学习材料的理解不足造成的。学生的不理解可以在学习过程中看到,一些学生即使基本不理解老师在全班面前呈现的材料,也不好意思提问。这类研究是准实验,采用设计组控制的形式进行研究设计。物理学习结果的数据表现在两个领域,即认知领域和情感领域。在认知领域,实验班的平均得分为67.37分,而普通班的平均得分为60.76分。从学生活动表的评估中获得的情感领域的学习成果,实验班平均为79分,对照组为74分。根据F检验的假设检验分析结果,发现t count = 1.64, t table = 2.00,其中-t table < t count < t table则假设被拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信