A Toolkit for the Usability Evaluation of Digital Health Technologies

Inocencio Daniel Maramba
{"title":"A Toolkit for the Usability Evaluation of Digital Health Technologies","authors":"Inocencio Daniel Maramba","doi":"10.14236/ewic/hci2022.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: NHS digital applications are often assessed against the NHS Digital Technology Assessment Criteria (DTAC). However, Small to Medium Enterprise (SME) developers often find DTAC itself ‘heavy going’. One criterion of DTAC is usability and SME developers need guidance on how to meet this criterion. My PhD is a four-part study to develop such guidance. Methods: (i) a scoping review of the methods of usability testing, (ii) development of a novel way of e mploying a usability scale, dividing it into discrete chunks to prevent “questionnaire fatigue”, (iii) development of a toolkit, (iv) application of the toolkit with SMEs. Results: (i) The scoping review identified 133 papers. (ii) The simpler way of administering the usability scale gave comparable results. (iii) I developed a toolkit that gives guidance on which testing method to employ, the number of participants, and the types of output. (iv) I have used the toolkit to guide three SMEs (two more in progress) in testing digital health technologies. Conclusions: The toolkit will aid SMEs in meeting DTAC criterion for usability. Further research is needed to refine and validate the toolkit and develop methods for evaluating new types of digital health applications such as virtual reality and voice interfaces.","PeriodicalId":413003,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Workshops in Computing","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Workshops in Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2022.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: NHS digital applications are often assessed against the NHS Digital Technology Assessment Criteria (DTAC). However, Small to Medium Enterprise (SME) developers often find DTAC itself ‘heavy going’. One criterion of DTAC is usability and SME developers need guidance on how to meet this criterion. My PhD is a four-part study to develop such guidance. Methods: (i) a scoping review of the methods of usability testing, (ii) development of a novel way of e mploying a usability scale, dividing it into discrete chunks to prevent “questionnaire fatigue”, (iii) development of a toolkit, (iv) application of the toolkit with SMEs. Results: (i) The scoping review identified 133 papers. (ii) The simpler way of administering the usability scale gave comparable results. (iii) I developed a toolkit that gives guidance on which testing method to employ, the number of participants, and the types of output. (iv) I have used the toolkit to guide three SMEs (two more in progress) in testing digital health technologies. Conclusions: The toolkit will aid SMEs in meeting DTAC criterion for usability. Further research is needed to refine and validate the toolkit and develop methods for evaluating new types of digital health applications such as virtual reality and voice interfaces.
数字卫生技术可用性评估工具包
简介:NHS数字应用通常根据NHS数字技术评估标准(DTAC)进行评估。然而,中小型企业(SME)开发者经常发现DTAC本身“很繁重”。DTAC的一个标准是可用性,SME开发人员需要关于如何满足这一标准的指导。我的博士研究分为四个部分,旨在开发这样的指导。方法:(i)对可用性测试方法进行范围审查,(ii)开发一种使用可用性量表的新方法,将其划分为离散的块以防止“问卷疲劳”,(iii)开发工具包,(iv)将工具包应用于中小企业。结果:(i)范围审查确定了133篇论文。管理可用性比额表的更简单的方法产生了可比较的结果。(iii)我开发了一个工具包,对采用哪种测试方法、参与者的数量和输出类型提供指导。(四)我使用工具包指导了三家中小企业(还有两家正在进行中)测试数字保健技术。结论:该工具包将帮助中小企业在满足DTAC标准的可用性。需要进一步的研究来完善和验证工具包,并开发评估新型数字健康应用(如虚拟现实和语音接口)的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信