Two-Level Scheduling Framework with Frame Level Scheduling and Exponential Rule in Wireless Network

Ee Mae Ang, K. Wee, Ying-Han Pang, S. Lau
{"title":"Two-Level Scheduling Framework with Frame Level Scheduling and Exponential Rule in Wireless Network","authors":"Ee Mae Ang, K. Wee, Ying-Han Pang, S. Lau","doi":"10.1109/ICISA.2014.6847476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the ongoing development in the Long Term Evolution (LTE), it was brought in to satisfy user's needs and demands on the enhancement of the wireless network's Quality of Service, especially for real-time applications. Real-time applications require low delay; in order to have a better user's experience. Hence, a scheduling framework focuses on real-time applications has been proposed and developed in this study. This paper compares the performance of real-time scheduling frameworks; 1) Modified-Largest Weighted Delay First (M-LWDF), 2) Frame Level Scheduler (FLS) and Proportional Fair downlink scheduler, and 3) our proposed two-level scheduling framework (FLS-M-EXP). Tests are carried out on these scheduling methods, and the data produced are gathered and analyzed. Simulation results showed that the proposed two-level scheduling framework with FLS and Exponential Rule (EXP) has a better performance in terms of delay as compared to the existing scheduling framework, which consists of FLS and Proportional Fair method. The proposed two-level scheduling framework also performs better than the common real-time scheduler, M-LWDF.","PeriodicalId":117185,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Information Science & Applications (ICISA)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Information Science & Applications (ICISA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISA.2014.6847476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Based on the ongoing development in the Long Term Evolution (LTE), it was brought in to satisfy user's needs and demands on the enhancement of the wireless network's Quality of Service, especially for real-time applications. Real-time applications require low delay; in order to have a better user's experience. Hence, a scheduling framework focuses on real-time applications has been proposed and developed in this study. This paper compares the performance of real-time scheduling frameworks; 1) Modified-Largest Weighted Delay First (M-LWDF), 2) Frame Level Scheduler (FLS) and Proportional Fair downlink scheduler, and 3) our proposed two-level scheduling framework (FLS-M-EXP). Tests are carried out on these scheduling methods, and the data produced are gathered and analyzed. Simulation results showed that the proposed two-level scheduling framework with FLS and Exponential Rule (EXP) has a better performance in terms of delay as compared to the existing scheduling framework, which consists of FLS and Proportional Fair method. The proposed two-level scheduling framework also performs better than the common real-time scheduler, M-LWDF.
无线网络中具有帧级调度和指数规则的两级调度框架
它是在长期演进(LTE)技术不断发展的基础上,为满足用户对提高无线网络服务质量,特别是实时应用的需求而提出的。实时应用需要低延迟;为了有更好的用户体验。因此,本研究提出并开发了一种针对实时应用的调度框架。本文比较了实时调度框架的性能;1)修正最大加权延迟优先(M-LWDF), 2)帧级调度(FLS)和比例公平下行调度(Proportional Fair downlink Scheduler), 3)我们提出的两级调度框架(FLS- m - exp)。对这些调度方法进行了测试,并对所产生的数据进行了收集和分析。仿真结果表明,与现有的FLS和比例公平调度框架相比,本文提出的FLS和EXP两级调度框架在延迟方面具有更好的性能。所提出的两级调度框架的性能也优于常用的实时调度程序M-LWDF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信