Fusion of methods for keystroke dynamic authentication

Sylvain Hocquet, Jean-Yves Ramel, H. Cardot
{"title":"Fusion of methods for keystroke dynamic authentication","authors":"Sylvain Hocquet, Jean-Yves Ramel, H. Cardot","doi":"10.1109/AUTOID.2005.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we present three methods for the keystroke dynamic authentication problem. We use in the first method, the average and the standard deviation, in the second the rhythm of striking and in the third, a comparison of the times order. After having presented these methods, we propose to realize a fusion of them. The results obtained indicate good performance of each method alone, as well as a significant improvement of performance with fusion, from 3.43% of EER for the best method alone down-to 1.8% with fusion.","PeriodicalId":206458,"journal":{"name":"Fourth IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies (AutoID'05)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies (AutoID'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTOID.2005.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

In this article, we present three methods for the keystroke dynamic authentication problem. We use in the first method, the average and the standard deviation, in the second the rhythm of striking and in the third, a comparison of the times order. After having presented these methods, we propose to realize a fusion of them. The results obtained indicate good performance of each method alone, as well as a significant improvement of performance with fusion, from 3.43% of EER for the best method alone down-to 1.8% with fusion.
按键动态认证方法的融合
在本文中,我们提出了针对击键动态认证问题的三种方法。我们在第一种方法中使用平均值和标准差,在第二种方法中使用敲击的节奏,在第三种方法中使用时间顺序的比较。在介绍了这些方法之后,我们建议实现它们的融合。得到的结果表明,每种方法单独使用都有良好的性能,融合后的性能显著提高,从最佳方法的3.43%下降到融合后的1.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信