Clinical Study on the Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Patients with Diabetes and Glaucoma

Nicoleta Anton, R. Ciuntu, Alina Cantemir, Cornelia Maria Glodeanu, C. Antón, C. Bogdănici
{"title":"Clinical Study on the Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Patients with Diabetes and Glaucoma","authors":"Nicoleta Anton, R. Ciuntu, Alina Cantemir, Cornelia Maria Glodeanu, C. Antón, C. Bogdănici","doi":"10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8970014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties in patients with glaucoma and diabetes. Material and methods: This is a prospective, comparative, observational study that included a total of 156 subjects, of which 48 healthy (96 eyes), 45 (90 eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma, 45 (90 eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma associated with diabetes and 17 (34 eyes) with diabetes only. All the patients were selected from St. Spiridon Hospital-Iasi, Euro Medi Center Clinic Iasi, Diabetes department and Oftaprof Clinic- Iasi. For all patients corneal viscoelasticity was measured by corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated PIO (IOPcc), Goldmann correlated IOP (IOPg), measured using the Reichert ORA (Ocular Response Analyzer) II. Results: The evaluation of the central corneal thickness did not reveal statistically significant differences between the study groups, neither in the right eye (p = 0.561) nor in the left eye (p = 0.455). Within each group, no significant differences were found between the IOP values in the right and left eye measured with the Goldmann aplanotometer (p> 0.05). The individual values of corneal hysteresis exceeded 10.8 ± 1.5 mmHg in 7.7% of patients in the right eye and in 13.5% patients in the left eye. The individual CRF values exceeded 11.0 ± 1.6 mmHg in 7.7% of patients in the right eye and 13.5% of patients in the left eye,. Within each group, there were no significant differences between right and left eye (p> 0.05). Corneal histerezis vs IOP determined with the Goldmann tonometer records moderate, statistically significant direct correlations only in group III. Conclusions: The values of corneal hysteresis and of the corneal resistance factor were higher in the groups with diabetes and in the healthy ones compared with the group with glaucoma. The presence of diabetes alters the biomechanical properties of the cornea, so in patients with diabetes we should consider these parameters in the distinction of those to be treated or only monitored for glaucoma.","PeriodicalId":419137,"journal":{"name":"2019 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8970014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties in patients with glaucoma and diabetes. Material and methods: This is a prospective, comparative, observational study that included a total of 156 subjects, of which 48 healthy (96 eyes), 45 (90 eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma, 45 (90 eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma associated with diabetes and 17 (34 eyes) with diabetes only. All the patients were selected from St. Spiridon Hospital-Iasi, Euro Medi Center Clinic Iasi, Diabetes department and Oftaprof Clinic- Iasi. For all patients corneal viscoelasticity was measured by corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated PIO (IOPcc), Goldmann correlated IOP (IOPg), measured using the Reichert ORA (Ocular Response Analyzer) II. Results: The evaluation of the central corneal thickness did not reveal statistically significant differences between the study groups, neither in the right eye (p = 0.561) nor in the left eye (p = 0.455). Within each group, no significant differences were found between the IOP values in the right and left eye measured with the Goldmann aplanotometer (p> 0.05). The individual values of corneal hysteresis exceeded 10.8 ± 1.5 mmHg in 7.7% of patients in the right eye and in 13.5% patients in the left eye. The individual CRF values exceeded 11.0 ± 1.6 mmHg in 7.7% of patients in the right eye and 13.5% of patients in the left eye,. Within each group, there were no significant differences between right and left eye (p> 0.05). Corneal histerezis vs IOP determined with the Goldmann tonometer records moderate, statistically significant direct correlations only in group III. Conclusions: The values of corneal hysteresis and of the corneal resistance factor were higher in the groups with diabetes and in the healthy ones compared with the group with glaucoma. The presence of diabetes alters the biomechanical properties of the cornea, so in patients with diabetes we should consider these parameters in the distinction of those to be treated or only monitored for glaucoma.
糖尿病合并青光眼患者角膜生物力学特性评价的临床研究
本研究的目的是评估青光眼合并糖尿病患者的角膜生物力学特性。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性、比较性、观察性研究,共纳入156名受试者,其中48名健康(96只眼),45名(90只眼)患有原发性开角型青光眼,45名(90只眼)患有糖尿病的原发性开角型青光眼,17名(34只眼)患有糖尿病。所有患者均选自Iasi St. Spiridon医院、Iasi欧洲医学中心诊所、糖尿病科和Iasi Oftaprof诊所。所有患者的角膜粘弹性均采用角膜迟滞(CH)、角膜阻力因子(CRF)、角膜代偿PIO (IOPcc)、Goldmann相关IOP (IOPg)测量,使用Reichert ORA(眼反应分析仪)II进行测量。结果:在评估角膜中央厚度时,两组之间没有统计学差异,无论是右眼(p = 0.561)还是左眼(p = 0.455)。各组右眼与左眼用Goldmann平面仪测量的IOP值比较,差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。右眼和左眼角膜迟滞个体值分别超过10.8±1.5 mmHg的占7.7%和13.5%。个体CRF值超过11.0±1.6 mmHg的右眼患者占7.7%,左眼患者占13.5%。各组内,右眼与左眼比较差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。用Goldmann眼压计测定的角膜组化与IOP仅在III组中记录了中度的、有统计学意义的直接相关性。结论:糖尿病组和健康人的角膜迟滞和角膜阻力因子均高于青光眼组。糖尿病的存在改变了角膜的生物力学特性,因此在糖尿病患者中,我们应该考虑这些参数来区分那些需要治疗或仅监测青光眼的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信