THE VALIDITY AND REALIBILITY OF IELTS SPEAKING RUBRIC FOR INLINGUA INTERNATIONAL TEACHERS

Purwanti Taman
{"title":"THE VALIDITY AND REALIBILITY OF IELTS SPEAKING RUBRIC FOR INLINGUA INTERNATIONAL TEACHERS","authors":"Purwanti Taman","doi":"10.32493/ljlal.v1i1.2483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe field of English for specific purposes (ESP) has developed rapidly to become a major force in English language teaching. IELTS (International English Language Testing System), as one of the ESP branch, is one of the biggest ESL tests needed world-wide.This study was conducted to find validity and reliability of IELTS speaking rubric between three teachers who assess speaking ability for the same students in the same class. This would enable IELTS teachers to measure the students’ speaking ability likely in the same band area. The participants of this quantitative study were 21 Indonesian graduate students who were taking English for Pre-departure program of their Master’s Degree abroad, an English for Academic Purpose (EAP) class. The result shows that the teachers in Inlingua Internatinal English training produce reliable and valid results of the speaking IELTS subtest; even though they have different working span experience because they use the same rubric. Also, the correlation between one group of scores to others are significant and linear. This can be reference for the future in the way Inlingua International maintain their teachers’ marking scheme.Keywords: IELTS, validity, realibility, speaking rubric, ESP","PeriodicalId":148876,"journal":{"name":"Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v1i1.2483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

AbstractThe field of English for specific purposes (ESP) has developed rapidly to become a major force in English language teaching. IELTS (International English Language Testing System), as one of the ESP branch, is one of the biggest ESL tests needed world-wide.This study was conducted to find validity and reliability of IELTS speaking rubric between three teachers who assess speaking ability for the same students in the same class. This would enable IELTS teachers to measure the students’ speaking ability likely in the same band area. The participants of this quantitative study were 21 Indonesian graduate students who were taking English for Pre-departure program of their Master’s Degree abroad, an English for Academic Purpose (EAP) class. The result shows that the teachers in Inlingua Internatinal English training produce reliable and valid results of the speaking IELTS subtest; even though they have different working span experience because they use the same rubric. Also, the correlation between one group of scores to others are significant and linear. This can be reference for the future in the way Inlingua International maintain their teachers’ marking scheme.Keywords: IELTS, validity, realibility, speaking rubric, ESP
雅思口语试题对国际语言教师的有效性和信度
摘要专用英语领域发展迅速,已成为英语教学的一支重要力量。IELTS(国际英语语言测试系统)作为ESP分支之一,是世界范围内最大的ESL考试之一。本研究在三位老师对同一班级的同一学生进行口语能力评估时,探讨了雅思口语试题的效度和信度。这将使雅思老师能够在同一波段测量学生的口语能力。这项定量研究的参与者是21名印度尼西亚研究生,他们在国外攻读硕士学位的出国前英语课程,即学术英语(EAP)课程。结果表明,Inlingua国际英语培训的教师在雅思口语子测试中给出了可靠有效的结果;尽管他们有不同的工作经验,因为他们使用相同的标题。此外,一组得分与其他组得分之间的相关性是显著的线性关系。这可以为Inlingua International未来维护教师评分制度的方式提供参考。关键词:雅思;效度;信度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信